Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878943›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2015

Ultrasound screening for deep venous thrombosis detection: a prospective evaluation of 200 plastic surgery outpatients.

Eric Swanson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03821597 (The Effect of Intraoperative Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03821597 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Intraoperative Sequential Compression Devices on Fibrinolysis in Plastic Surgery Outpatients: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwanson CenterRan2018 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsBlood Coagulation DisorderArmsSequential compression devices (SCDs), No sequential compression.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A New Approach for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Point-of-care ultrasound for deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. The Expanding Role of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2018
    Article
  9. Effect of Model Thrombus Volume and Elastic Modulus on Magnetomotive Ultrasound Signal Under Pulsatile Flow.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric SwansonSwanson Center, Leawood, Kans.
Swanson Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur understanding of the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism is largely based on the experience of orthopedic patients undergoing total joint replacement. Little is known regarding the natural history of venous thromboembolism in plastic surgery outpatients. Today, ultrasound screening, including compression and Doppler color flow imaging, represents the standard for detecting deep venous thromboses.

methodsUltrasound screening was offered to 200 consecutive plastic surgery outpatients undergoing 205 operations. Patients were scanned before surgery, on the day after surgery, and approximately 1 week after surgery. No patient declined to participate (inclusion rate, 100%). Spontaneous breathing, Avoid gas, Face up, Extremities mobile anesthesia was used, with no chemoprophylaxis. Patient surveys were administered.

resultsSix hundred ultrasound screening tests were performed. All scans performed the day after surgery were negative. Only one examination was positive, 8 days after a lipoabdominoplasty. Subsequent scans revealed complete resolution of the thrombosis with anticoagulation. Ninety percent of surveyed patients would choose to have ultrasound screening in the future.

conclusionsThe natural history of thromboembolism in plastic surgery outpatients differs from orthopedic patients. The risk of a deep venous thrombosis in a patient treated with Spontaneous breathing, Avoid gas, Face up, Extremities mobile anesthesia is approximately 0.5%. Thromboses are unlikely to develop intraoperatively. In the single affected patient, the thrombosis was located distally, in a location that is less prone to embolism and highly susceptible to anticoagulation. Ultrasound screening is an effective and highly feasible method to identify affected patients for treatment.

Identifiers

PMID25878943
PMCPMC4387154
OpenAlexW2320444440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.