Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878899›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgical oncology2015

Mucus containing cystic lesions "mucocele" of the appendix: the unresolved issues.

Mohammad Ezzedien Rabie, Mubarak Al Shraim, Mohammad Saad Al Skaini, Saad Alqahtani, Ismail El Hakeem, Abdulla Saad Al Qahtani, Tarek Malatani, Abduelah Hummadi

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Acellular Appendix Vermiform Mucinous Neoplasm.Case reports in pathology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mucocele of the Appendix: A Presentation.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Giant Appendicular Mucocele Due to Mucinous Cystadenoma.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad Ezzedien RabieDepartment of Surgery, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Mubarak Al ShraimDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0149-2911
Mohammad Saad Al SkainiDepartment of Surgery, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia ; Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Saad AlqahtaniDepartment of Radiology, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Ismail El HakeemDepartment of Surgery, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulla Saad Al QahtaniDepartment of Surgery, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek MalataniDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Saudi Arabia.
Abduelah HummadiDepartment of Surgery, Armed Forces Hospital, Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Armed Forces Hospital · SAKing Khalid University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucocele of the appendix is a rare condition, the pathological classification and management strategy of which have not been standardized yet.

aimTo report on our management of appendiceal mucocele, highlighting the pitfalls and possible means for avoiding them. MATERIALS AND

methodsOur registries were reviewed to retrieve cases of appendiceal mucocele, encountered in the period from July 2008 to May 2013.

resultsWe had 9 cases, three males and sex females, with a median age of 62 years. Abdominal ultrasound (US) and computerized axial tomography scan (CT) suspected the diagnosis in only one case each. Open appendectomy was done in two cases of mucinous cystadenoma with no further surgery performed, despite the positive margin in one. Laparoscopic appendectomy was done in three cases: mucinous cystadenoma in one case which needed no further surgery, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with pseudomyxoma peritonei in another, and low grade mucinous tumour in a third case, and all needed subsequent right hemicolectomy. Exploratory laparotomy was done in three cases: of these, synchronous right hemicolectomy was done in one case of mucinous cystadenoma/?mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential; in the other two cases, appendectomy only was done for mucinous hyperplasia with carcinoid tumour of the appendix in one case and mucinous cystadenoma/?mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential in another. The 9th case was discovered upon laparoscopy for cholecystectomy; when pseudomyxoma peritonei arising from an appendiceal mucocele was found, laparoscopic appendectomy with peritoneal biopsy was then performed instead. Histopathologic diagnostic uncertainty was present in two cases of mucinous cystadenoma where mucinous tumour of uncertain malignant potential was an alternative possibility. Perioperative colonoscopy was performed in only one case and our follow-up programme was defective, with the longest period being 180 days.

conclusionMucocele of the appendix should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions in the right lower abdomen. Owing to its rarity, it continues to intrigue the surgeon as well as the radiologist and pathologist alike. For mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, right hemicolectomy is usually needed, whereas for hyperplasia and cystadenoma, appendectomy usually suffices if the resection margins are free. For mucinous tumours of uncertain malignant potential and low grade mucinous tumours as well as pseudomyxoma peritonei, the decision is not as simple. As for laparoscopic surgery, no solid proof exists with or against its safety. Although not yet standardized, perioperative colonoscopy and regular follow-up to detect early recurrences should probably be part of the management plan.

Indexed as

AppendixCecal DiseasesMucoceleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendectomyColectomyColonoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRadiography

Identifiers

PMID25878899
PMCPMC4386699
OpenAlexW2091355082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.