Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878476›Full record

ArticleJournal of international oral health : JIOH2015

Efficacy of Oral Brush Biopsy without Computer-Assisted Analysis in Oral Premalignant and Malignant Lesions: A Study.

Aarti Trakroo, M K Sunil, Ashwarya Trivedi, Ranjana Garg, Arun Kulkarni, Saloni Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of international oral health : JIOH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. New Horizons and Prospects in Oral Cancer Detection.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aarti TrakrooPost Graduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Guru Nanak Dev Dental and Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India.
M K SunilProfessor & Head, Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Guru Nanak Dev Dental and Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India.
Ashwarya TrivediReader, Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Guru Nanak Dev Dental and Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India.
Ranjana GargAssociate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, DJ College of Dental Science and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arun KulkarniProfessor & Head, Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Maharashtra Institute of Dental Science and Research (Dental College), Lathur, Maharashtra, India.
Saloni AroraPost Graduate Student, Guru Nanak Dev Dental College & Research Institute, Sunam, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the present study, the reliability of oral brush biopsy in identifying dysplasia in clinically diagnosed oral potentially malignant and malignant lesions was evaluated while comparing the findings with scalpel biopsy in terms of sensitivity and specificity. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn our study, a total number of 50 patients that included both premalignant and malignant lesions were included. Oral brush cytology using a cytobrush was done for all patients, which was followed by incisional biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were obtained. To see the agreement between two modalities Kappa test of agreement was applied. A P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Proportions were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

resultsBrush cytology using a cytobrush is a reliable adjunct to histopathology in detecting oral premalignant and malignant oral lesions and can be easily performed with less cost and less discomfort. This technique showed a reasonable sensitivity and specificity thus substantiating its reliability in evaluation of oral premalignant and malignant lesions.

conclusionThe oral brush biopsy is a simple and rapid, non-invasive and relatively painless and well accepted by patient. It is suitable in population screening programs and for pre- and post-treatment observation of confirmed premalignant and malignant lesions and has proved applications in incapacitated areas.

Indexed as

Cytobrushcytopathologyincisional biopsymalignant lesionspotentially malignant

Identifiers

PMID25878476
PMCPMC4385723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.