Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878347›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Quick Detection of FKS1 Mutations Responsible for Clinical Echinocandin Resistance in Candida albicans.

Catiana Dudiuk, Soledad Gamarra, Cristina Jimenez-Ortigosa, Florencia Leonardelli, Daiana Macedo, David S Perlin, Guillermo Garcia-Effron

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Annual review of microbiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Antimicrobial effects of XF drugs againstFrontiers in fungal biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Can We Improve Antifungal Susceptibility Testing?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catiana DudiukLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Cátedra de Parasitología y Micología, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), CCT, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Soledad GamarraLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Cátedra de Parasitología y Micología, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Cristina Jimenez-OrtigosaPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Florencia LeonardelliLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Cátedra de Parasitología y Micología, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), CCT, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Daiana MacedoLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Cátedra de Parasitología y Micología, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
David S PerlinPublic Health Research Institute, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Guillermo Garcia-EffronLaboratorio de Micología y Diagnóstico Molecular, Cátedra de Parasitología y Micología, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), CCT, Santa Fe, Argentina ggarcia@unl.edu.ar.
National University of the Littoral · ARCentro Científico Tecnológico - Santa Fe · ARRutgers Health

Funding

Critical Factors Influencing Echinocandin Resistance in CandidaglabrataR01AI109025 · NIAID · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2014 to 2025
$9.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI109025NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI109025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapid molecular-based assay for the detection of the Candida albicans FKS1 gene mutations responsible for resistance to echinocandin drugs was designed and evaluated. The assay consisted of a multiplexed PCR set of 5 tubes able to detect the most commonly described resistance mechanism, including FKS1 hot spot 1 and hot spot 2 mutations. The performance and specificity of the assay was evaluated using a double-blinded panel of 50 C. albicans strains. The assay showed a sensitivity of 96% and was able to detect all homozygous mutants included in the collection of strains, demonstrating that it is a robust, quick, and labor-saving method that is suitable for a routine clinical diagnostic laboratory.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansDouble-Blind MethodEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsGenotyping TechniquesHumansMembrane ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMutant ProteinsMutationSensitivity and SpecificityAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMutant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25878347
PMCPMC4473184
OpenAlexW2045735637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.