Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878266›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Microsecond-scale timing precision in rodent trigeminal primary afferents.

Michael R Bale, Dario Campagner, Andrew Erskine, Rasmus S Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prediction of Choice from Competing Mechanosensory and Choice-Memory Cues during Active Tactile Decision Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Whisking mechanics and active sensing.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael R BaleFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom and Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante UMH-CSIC, Sant Joan d'Alacant, 03550 Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-962X
Dario CampagnerFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-4575
Andrew ErskineFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4392-1873
Rasmus S PetersenFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom and r.petersen@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-977X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G020094/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L007282/1Medical Research Council MR/L01064X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097820/Z/11/B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication in the nervous system occurs by spikes: the timing precision with which spikes are fired is a fundamental limit on neural information processing. In sensory systems, spike-timing precision is constrained by first-order neurons. We found that spike-timing precision of trigeminal primary afferents in rats and mice is limited both by stimulus speed and by electrophysiological sampling rate. High-speed video of behaving mice revealed whisker velocities of at least 17,000°/s, so we delivered an ultrafast "ping" (>50,000°/s) to single whiskers and sampled primary afferent activity at 500 kHz. Median spike jitter was 17.4 μs; 29% of neurons had spike jitter < 10 μs. These results indicate that the input stage of the trigeminal pathway has extraordinary spike-timing precision and very high potential information capacity. This timing precision ranks among the highest in biology.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMovementNeuronsPhysical StimulationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeTrigeminal GanglionVibrissaeneural codingtrigeminal ganglionvibrissawhisker

Identifiers

PMID25878266
PMCPMC4397594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.