Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878201›Full record

ReviewNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2016

Motor Cortex and Motor Cortical Interhemispheric Communication in Walking After Stroke: The Roles of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Animal Models in Our Current and Future Understanding.

Charalambos C Charalambous, Mark G Bowden, DeAnna L Adkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charalambos C CharalambousDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Mark G BowdenDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.
DeAnna L AdkinsDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC adkinsdl@musc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · USRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Cortical Stimulation to Enhance Motor Recovery Following Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS065866 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ADKINS, DEANNA L · 2011 to 2015
$1.2M
Augmentation of Locomotor Adaptation Post-StrokeIK2RX000787 · VA · RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOWDEN, MARK G. · 2015 to 2017
–
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040-01NINDS NIH HHS NS065866NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065866RRD VA IK2 RX000787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the plethora of human neurophysiological research, the bilateral involvement of the leg motor cortical areas and their interhemispheric interaction during both normal and impaired human walking is poorly understood. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we have expanded our understanding of the role upper-extremity motor cortical areas play in normal movements and how stroke alters this role, and probed the efficacy of interventions to improve post-stroke arm function. However, similar investigations of the legs have lagged behind, in part, due to the anatomical difficulty in using TMS to stimulate the leg motor cortical areas. Additionally, leg movements are predominately bilaterally controlled and require interlimb coordination that may involve both hemispheres. The sensitive, but invasive, tools used in animal models of locomotion hold great potential for increasing our understanding of the bihemispheric motor cortical control of walking. In this review, we discuss 3 themes associated with the bihemispheric motor cortical control of walking after stroke: (a) what is known about the role of the bihemispheric motor cortical control in healthy and poststroke leg movements, (b) how the neural remodeling of the contralesional hemisphere can affect walking recovery after a stroke, and (c) what is the effect of behavioral rehabilitation training of walking on the neural remodeling of the motor cortical areas bilaterally. For each theme, we discuss how rodent models can enhance the present knowledge on human walking by testing hypotheses that cannot be investigated in humans, and how these findings can then be back-translated into the neurorehabilitation of poststroke walking.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalStroke RehabilitationWalkingAnimalsFunctional LateralityHumansLegLower ExtremityMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRecovery of FunctionStrokeTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationinterhemispheric motor cortical communicationrehabilitationrodent modelsstroketranslational sciencewalking

Identifiers

PMID25878201
PMCPMC4607550
OpenAlexW2319721905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.