Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25878159›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Cortical drive of low-frequency oscillations in the human nucleus accumbens during action selection.

Max-Philipp Stenner, Vladimir Litvak, Robb B Rutledge, Tino Zaehle, Friedhelm C Schmitt, Jürgen Voges, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Raymond J Dolan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cannabinoid disruption of learning mechanisms involved in reward processing.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Max-Philipp StennerWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; max-philipp.stenner@med.ovgu.de.
Vladimir LitvakWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom;
Robb B RutledgeWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.
Tino ZaehleDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany;
Friedhelm C SchmittDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany;
Jürgen VogesDepartment of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; and.
Hans-Jochen HeinzeDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; and.
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 098362Wellcome Trust 098362/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens is thought to contribute to action selection by integrating behaviorally relevant information from multiple regions, including prefrontal cortex. Studies in rodents suggest that information flow to the nucleus accumbens may be regulated via task-dependent oscillatory coupling between regions. During instrumental behavior, local field potentials (LFP) in the rat nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex are coupled at delta frequencies (Gruber AJ, Hussain RJ, O'Donnell P. PLoS One 4: e5062, 2009), possibly mediating suppression of afferent input from other areas and thereby supporting cortical control (Calhoon GG, O'Donnell P. Neuron 78: 181-190, 2013). In this report, we demonstrate low-frequency cortico-accumbens coupling in humans, both at rest and during a decision-making task. We recorded LFP from the nucleus accumbens in six epilepsy patients who underwent implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes. All patients showed significant coherence and phase-synchronization between LFP and surface EEG at delta and low theta frequencies. Although the direction of this coupling as indexed by Granger causality varied between subjects in the resting-state data, all patients showed a cortical drive of the nucleus accumbens during action selection in a decision-making task. In three patients this was accompanied by a significant coherence increase over baseline. Our results suggest that low-frequency cortico-accumbens coupling represents a highly conserved regulatory mechanism for action selection.

Indexed as

AdultCerebral CortexDecision MakingDeep Brain StimulationDelta RhythmElectroencephalographyEpilepsyFemaleHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsMaleNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsNucleus AccumbensPeriodicityPsychomotor Performanceaction selectiondeep brain stimulationlocal field potentialsnucleus accumbenssynchronization

Identifiers

PMID25878159
PMCPMC4518721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.