ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2015
When our genome is targeted by pathogenic bacteria.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Immunogenic Role of Self-DNA in T Cell Immunity.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout strategies for enhancing immunotherapy in breast cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- Chlorinated Water Modulates the Development of Colorectal Tumors with Chromosomal Instability and Gut Microbiota in Apc-Deficient Mice.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eukaryotic cells repair thousands of lesions arising in the genome at each cell cycle. The most hazardous damage is likely DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) that cleave the double helix backbone. DSBs occur naturally during T cell receptor and immunoglobulin gene recombination in lymphocytes. DSBs can also arise as a consequence of exogenous stresses (e.g., ionizing irradiation, chemotherapeutic drugs, viruses) or oxidative processes. An increasing number of studies have reported that infection with pathogenic bacteria also alters the host genome, producing DSB and other modifications on DNA. This review focuses on recent data on bacteria-induced DNA damage and the known strategies used by these pathogens to maintain a physiological niche in the host. Even after DNA repair in infected cells, "scars" often remain on chromosomes and might generate genomic instability at the next cell division. Chronic inflammation in tissue, combined with infection and DNA damage, can give rise to genomic instability and eventually cancer. A functional link between the DNA damage response and the innate immune response has been recently established. Pathogenic bacteria also highjack the host cell cycle, often acting on the stability of the master regulator p53, or dampen the DNA damage response to support bacterial replication in an appropriate reservoir. Except in a few cases, the molecular mechanisms responsible for DNA lesions are poorly understood, although ROS release during infection is a serious candidate for generating DNA breaks. Thus, chronic or repetitive infections with genotoxic bacteria represent a common source of DNA lesions that compromise host genome integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.