ReviewGlycoconjugate journal2015
Glycan microarrays of fluorescently-tagged natural glycans.
Review in Glycoconjugate journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Versatile Glycan Probes for Multiplatform Investigation of Glycan Interactions with Proteins, Viruses, and Cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Lectin Microarray-based Glycomics and Machine Learning Identify Shared Osteoarthritis Biomarkers in Humans, Dogs, and Horses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Glycan Array Technology.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2021Article
- Chondroitin Sulfate/Dermatan Sulfate-Protein Interactions and Their Biological Functions in Human Diseases: Implications and Analytical Tools.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Tools for generating and analyzing glycan microarray data.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2020Review
- Preparation of Complex Glycans From Natural Sources for Functional Study.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- Novel Reversible Fluorescent Glycan Linker for Functional Glycomics.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2019Article
- Factors contributing to variability of glycan microarray binding profiles.Faraday discussions · 2019Article
- Glycan Microarrays as Chemical Tools for Identifying Glycan Recognition by Immune Proteins.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Review
- Natural and Synthetic Sialylated Glycan Microarrays and Their Applications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Review
- Emerging glycobiology tools: A renaissance in accessibility.Cellular immunology · 2018Review
- Glycointeractions in bacterial pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018Review
- Profiling Anti-Neu5Gc IgG in Human Sera with a Sialoglycan Microarray Assay.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Ultrasensitive detection of influenza viruses with a glycan-based impedimetric biosensor.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2016Article
- Multivalent Carbohydrate-Lectin Interactions: How Synthetic Chemistry Enables Insights into Nanometric Recognition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review discusses the challenges facing research in 'functional glycomics' and the novel technologies that are being developed to advance the field. The structural complexity of glycans and glycoconjugates makes studies of both their structures and recognition difficult. However, these intricate structures can be captured from their natural sources, isolated and fluorescently-tagged for detailed structural analysis and for presentation on glycan microarrays for functional recognition by glycan-binding proteins. These advances in glycan preparation and manipulation enable the streamlining of functional glycomics studies and will help to propel the field forward in studying natural, biologically relevant glycans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.