Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25877690›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2015

Engineering clinically relevant volumes of vascularized bone.

Brianna M Roux, Ming-Huei Cheng, Eric M Brey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brianna M RouxDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA; Research Service, Edward Hines Jr. V.A. Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Ming-Huei Cheng
Eric M Brey

Funding

Application of Tubular Perfusion System (TPS) Generated Prevascularized Bone TissR01AR061460 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FISHER, JOHN P · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
Synthetic Matrices for Vascularization of Engineered TissuesI01BX000418 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI BREY, ERIC M · 2010 to 2017
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000418NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR061460NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR061460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascularization remains one of the most important challenges that must be overcome for tissue engineering to be consistently implemented for reconstruction of large volume bone defects. An extensive vascular network is needed for transport of nutrients, waste and progenitor cells required for remodelling and repair. A variety of tissue engineering strategies have been investigated in an attempt to vascularize tissues, including those applying cells, soluble factor delivery strategies, novel design and optimization of bio-active materials, vascular assembly pre-implantation and surgical techniques. However, many of these strategies face substantial barriers that must be overcome prior to their ultimate translation into clinical application. In this review recent progress in engineering vascularized bone will be presented with an emphasis on clinical feasibility.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone TransplantationHumansOsteogenesisTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materialsbone tissue engineeringclinical applicationsvascularization

Identifiers

PMID25877690
PMCPMC4420594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.