Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25876848›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

The uptake and excretion of partially oxidized sulfur expands the repertoire of energy resources metabolized by hydrothermal vent symbioses.

R A Beinart, A Gartman, J G Sanders, G W Luther, P R Girguis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Heterotrophic Sulfur Oxidation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Abiotic redox reactions in hydrothermal mixing zones: Decreased energy availability for the subsurface biosphere.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R A BeinartDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02136, USA rbeinart@whoi.edu.
A GartmanSchool of Marine Science and Policy, College of Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of Delaware, Lewes, MD, USA.
J G SandersDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02136, USA.
G W LutherSchool of Marine Science and Policy, College of Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of Delaware, Lewes, MD, USA.
P R GirguisDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02136, USA pgirguis@oeb.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiotic associations between animals and chemoautotrophic bacteria crowd around hydrothermal vents. In these associations, symbiotic bacteria use chemical reductants from venting fluid for the energy to support autotrophy, providing primary nutrition for the host. At vents along the Eastern Lau Spreading Center, the partially oxidized sulfur compounds (POSCs) thiosulfate and polysulfide have been detected in and around animal communities but away from venting fluid. The use of POSCs for autotrophy, as an alternative to the chemical substrates in venting fluid, could mitigate competition in these communities. To determine whether ESLC symbioses could use thiosulfate to support carbon fixation or produce POSCs during sulfide oxidation, we used high-pressure, flow-through incubations to assess the productivity of three symbiotic mollusc genera-the snails Alviniconcha spp. and Ifremeria nautilei, and the mussel Bathymodiolus brevior-when oxidizing sulfide and thiosulfate. Via the incorporation of isotopically labelled inorganic carbon, we found that the symbionts of all three genera supported autotrophy while oxidizing both sulfide and thiosulfate, though at different rates. Additionally, by concurrently measuring their effect on sulfur compounds in the aquaria with voltammetric microelectrodes, we showed that these symbioses excreted POSCs under highly sulfidic conditions, illustrating that these symbioses could represent a source for POSCs in their habitat. Furthermore, we revealed spatial disparity in the rates of carbon fixation among the animals in our incubations, which might have implications for the variability of productivity in situ. Together, these results re-shape our thinking about sulfur cycling and productivity by vent symbioses, demonstrating that thiosulfate may be an ecologically important energy source for vent symbioses and that they also likely impact the local geochemical regime through the excretion of POSCs.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaSymbiosisAnimalsBacteriaBivalviaCarbon CycleDNA, BacterialHydrothermal VentsMolecular Sequence DataOxidation-ReductionPacific OceanRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASulfidesSulfurDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfidesSulfurecosystem engineerhydrothermal ventsulfur metabolismsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID25876848
PMCPMC4426611
OpenAlexW2002160116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.