Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25876736›Full record

Trial reportAdministration and policy in mental health2016

Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites.

Leonard Bickman, Susan R Douglas, Ana Regina Vides De Andrade, Michele Tomlinson, Alissa Gleacher, Serene Olin, Kimberly Hoagwood

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Administration and policy in mental health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05626231 (Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness and Engagement for Youth With Documented Mental Health Disparities), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05626231 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness and Engagement for Youth With Documented Mental Health Disparities

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston CollegeRan2022 to 2025Enrolled286ConditionsKnowledge, Attitudes, PracticeArmsTraining Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Adolescent Client and Clinician Predictors of Measurement-Based Care Fidelity in Community Mental Health Settings.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leonard BickmanVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA. leonard.bickman@vanderbilt.edu.
Susan R DouglasVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Ana Regina Vides De AndradeVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Michele TomlinsonHope Network, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Alissa GleacherNew York University, New York, USA.
Serene OlinNew York University, New York, USA.
Kimberly HoagwoodNew York University, New York, USA.

Funding

Research Methods CoreP30MH090322 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E. · 2011 to 2015
$8.1M
Implementing Feedback Interventions to Improve OutcomesR01MH068589 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BICKMAN, LEONARD · 2004 to 2008
$2.9M
Implementation of Feedback System to Improve EBTs for Children in Mental HealthR18HS018036 · AHRQ · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E. · 2009 to 2011
$895k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS018036NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090322NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized experiment was conducted in two outpatient clinics evaluating a measurement feedback system called contextualized feedback systems. The clinicians of 257 Youth 11-18 received feedback on progress in mental health symptoms and functioning either every 6 months or as soon as the youth's, clinician's or caregiver's data were entered into the system. The ITT analysis showed that only one of the two participating clinics (Clinic R) had an enhanced outcome because of feedback, and only for the clinicians' ratings of youth symptom severity on the SFSS. A dose-response effect was found only for Clinic R for both the client and clinician ratings. Implementation analyses showed that Clinic R had better implementation of the feedback intervention. Clinicians' questionnaire completion rate and feedback viewing at Clinic R were 50 % higher than clinicians at Clinic U. The discussion focused on the differences in implementation at each site and how these differences may have contributed to the different outcomes of the experiment.

Indexed as

FeedbackMental Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersProcess Assessment, Health CareSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeContextualized feedback systems (CFS)Implementation analysisMeasurement feedback system (MFS)Peabody treatment progress battery (PTPB)Routine outcome measurement (ROM)Symptoms and functioning severity scale (SFSS)Youth mental health services outcomes

Identifiers

PMID25876736
PMCPMC4608853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.