Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25876227›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2015

Systematic review of outcomes following fixed angle intramedullary fixation of distal radius fractures.

John Hardman, Nawfal Al-Hadithy, Thomas Hester, Raymond Anakwe

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Outcome after treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly using the IlluminOssEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John HardmanDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College NHS Trust, Praed St, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK. john.hardman4@nhs.net.
Nawfal Al-HadithyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College NHS Trust, Praed St, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Thomas HesterKings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Raymond AnakweDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Imperial College NHS Trust, Praed St, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Imperial College London · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere remains little consensus regarding the optimal management of distal radius fractures. Fixed angle volar devices have gained recent popularity, but have also been associated with soft tissue complications. Intramedullary (IM) devices offer fixed angle stabilisation with minimally invasive surgical technique and low, IM profile. No formal review of outcomes could be identified.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of clinical studies regarding the use of fixed angle IM devices in acute extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal radius fractures. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidance was followed. Numerical data regarding functional scores, ranges of movement, radiological outcomes and complications were pooled to produce aggregate means and standard deviation.

resultsA total of 310 titles and abstracts were identified. Fourteen papers remained for analysis. Total patient number was 357, mean age 63.72 years and mean follow-up 12.77 months. Mean functional scores were all rated as 'excellent'. Aggregate means: flexion 53.62°, extension 56.38°, pronation 69.10°, supination 70.29°, ulnar deviation 28.35°, radial deviation 18.12°, radial height 8.98 mm, radial inclination 16.51°, volar tilt 5.35°, ulnar variance 0.66 mm and grip strength 90.37 %. Overall complication rate was 19.6 %. Tendon rupture was unreported. Tendon irritation was 0.88 %. Radial nerve paraesthesia was 11.44 %.

conclusionsFixed angle IM devices facilitate excellent functional outcomes, with radiological and clinical parameters at least equivalent to volar plate devices. Low rates of tendon irritation and absence of tendon rupture are advantageous. Significant limitations include a lack of application for complex articular injuries and the propensity to cause a transient neuritis of the superficial branch of the radial nerve.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansInternal FixatorsIntra-Articular FracturesRadiographyRadius FracturesTreatment OutcomeDistal radius fractureIntramedullary fixationSystematic reviewTendon rupture

Identifiers

PMID25876227
OpenAlexW1994333426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.