Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25876000›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2016

Treatments and costs for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the Netherlands.

Naomi van der Linden, Jan Buter, Chris P Pescott, Roy I Lalisang, Jan Paul de Boer, Alexander de Graeff, Carla M L van Herpen, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Carin A Uyl-de Groot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A qualitative examination of patient priorities and preferences during treatment decision-making for recurrent head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Benefit of cetuximab addition to a platinum-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy according to KRAS-LCS6 variant in an unselected population of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancers.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Naomi van der LindenInstitute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein location (J5-51), P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vanderlinden@bmg.eur.nl.
Jan ButerVU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.buter@vumc.nl.
Chris P PescottMerck KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, F135/101, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany. chris.pescott@merckgroup.com.
Roy I LalisangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW, School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. roy.lalisang@mumc.nl.
Jan Paul de BoerNetherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.d.boer@nki.nl.
Alexander de GraeffUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.degraeff@umcutrecht.nl.
Carla M L van HerpenRadboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. carla.vanherpen@radboudumc.nl.
Robert J Baatenburg de JongErasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands. r.j.baatenburgdejong@erasmusmc.nl.
Carin A Uyl-de GrootInstitute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. uyl@bmg.eur.nl.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus MC · NLMerck (Germany) · DERadboud University Medical Center · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN), chemotherapy can prolong life and alleviate symptoms. However, expected gains may be small, not necessarily outweighing considerable toxicity and high costs. Treatment choice is to a large extent dependent on preferences of doctors and patients and data on these choices are scarce. The purpose of this study is to obtain real-world information on palliative systemic treatment and costs of R/M SCCHN in the Netherlands. In six Dutch head and neck treatment centers, data were collected on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, disease progression, survival, adverse events, and resource use for R/M SCCHN, between 2006 and 2013. 125 (14 %) out of 893 R/M SCCHN patients received palliative, non-trial first-line systemic treatment, mainly platinum + 5FU + cetuximab (32 %), other platinum-based combination therapy (13 %), methotrexate monotherapy (27 %) and capecitabine monotherapy (14 %). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 and 6.0 months, respectively. 34 (27 %) patients experienced severe adverse events. Mean total hospital costs ranged from € 10,075 (± € 9,891) (methotrexate monotherapy) to € 39,459 (± € 21,149) (platinum + 5FU + cetuximab). Primary cost drivers were hospital stays and anticancer drug treatments. Major health care utilization and costs are involved in systemically treating R/M SCCHN patients with a limited survival.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCombined Modality TherapyCosts and Cost AnalysisDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNetherlandsCarcinoma, squamous cell of head and neckCosts and cost analysisDrug therapy

Identifiers

PMID25876000
PMCPMC4733133
OpenAlexW1989519662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.