Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25875852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Systems biology analysis merging phenotype, metabolomic and genomic data identifies Non-SMC Condensin I Complex, Subunit G (NCAPG) and cellular maintenance processes as major contributors to genetic variability in bovine feed efficiency.

Philipp Widmann, Antonio Reverter, Rosemarie Weikard, Karsten Suhre, Harald M Hammon, Elke Albrecht, Christa Kuehn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Identification of Key Genes Associated with Feed Utilization Efficiency inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Mutations in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative expression analysis of water buffalo (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp WidmannLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Genome Biology, Genome Physiology Unit, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Antonio ReverterCSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Brisbane, Australia.
Rosemarie WeikardLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Genome Biology, Genome Physiology Unit, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Karsten SuhreWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Doha, State of Qatar; Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Harald M HammonLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Nutritional Physiology "Oskar Kellner", Dummerstorf, Germany.
Elke AlbrechtLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Muscle Biology and Growth, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Christa KuehnLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Institute for Genome Biology, Genome Physiology Unit, Dummerstorf, Germany; Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed efficiency is a paramount factor for livestock economy. Previous studies had indicated a substantial heritability of several feed efficiency traits. In our study, we investigated the genetic background of residual feed intake, a commonly used parameter of feed efficiency, in a cattle resource population generated from crossing dairy and beef cattle. Starting from a whole genome association analysis, we subsequently performed combined phenotype-metabolome-genome analysis taking a systems biology approach by inferring gene networks based on partial correlation and information theory approaches. Our data about biological processes enriched with genes from the feed efficiency network suggest that genetic variation in feed efficiency is driven by genetic modulation of basic processes relevant to general cellular functions. When looking at the predicted upstream regulators from the feed efficiency network, the Tumor Protein P53 (TP53) and Transforming Growth Factor beta 1 (TGFB1) genes stood out regarding significance of overlap and number of target molecules in the data set. These results further support the hypothesis that TP53 is a major upstream regulator for genetic variation of feed efficiency. Furthermore, our data revealed a significant effect of both, the Non-SMC Condensin I Complex, Subunit G (NCAPG) I442M (rs109570900) and the Growth /differentiation factor 8 (GDF8) Q204X (rs110344317) loci, on residual feed intake and feed conversion. For both loci, the growth promoting allele at the onset of puberty was associated with a negative, but favorable effect on residual feed intake. The elevated energy demand for increased growth triggered by the NCAPG 442M allele is obviously not fully compensated for by an increased efficiency in converting feed into body tissue. As a consequence, the individuals carrying the NCAPG 442M allele had an additional demand for energy uptake that is reflected by the association of the allele with increased daily energy intake as observed in our study.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenomeGenotypePhenotypeAllelesAnimal FeedAnimalsBody WeightCattleCell Cycle ProteinsCrosses, GeneticEatingFeeding BehaviorGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenetic LociCell Cycle ProteinsMyostatinTransforming Growth Factor beta1Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25875852
PMCPMC4398489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.