Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25875834›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Dynamics of biofilm formation and the interaction between Candida albicans and methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Chaiene Evelin Zago, Sónia Silva, Paula Volpato Sanitá, Paula Aboud Barbugli, Carla Maria Improta Dias, Virgínia Barreto Lordello, Carlos Eduardo Vergani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MixedJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effect of Mn(II) and Co(II) on Anti-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Time-lapse mesoscopy ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Anti-Virulence Effect ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chaiene Evelin ZagoDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sónia SilvaIBB-Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Center of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Paula Volpato SanitáDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula Aboud BarbugliDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla Maria Improta DiasDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Virgínia Barreto LordelloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo VerganiDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista. Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymicrobial biofilms are an understudied and a clinically relevant problem. This study evaluates the interaction between C. albicans, and methicillin- susceptible (MSSA) and resistant (MRSA) S. aureus growing in single- and dual-species biofilms. Single and dual species adhesion (90 min) and biofilms (12, 24, and 48 h) were evaluated by complementary methods: counting colony-forming units (CFU mL-1), XTT-reduction, and crystal violet staining (CV). The secretion of hydrolytic enzymes by the 48 h biofilms was also evaluated using fluorimetric kits. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess biofilm structure. The results from quantification assays were compared using two-way ANOVAs with Tukey post-hoc tests, while data from enzymatic activities were analyzed by one-way Welch-ANOVA followed by Games-Howell post hoc test (α = 0.05). C. albicans, MSSA and MRSA were able to adhere and to form biofilm in both single or mixed cultures. In general, all microorganisms in both growth conditions showed a gradual increase in the number of cells and metabolic activity over time, reaching peak values between 12 h and 48 h (ρ<0.05). C. albicans single- and dual-biofilms had significantly higher total biomass values (ρ<0.05) than single biofilms of bacteria. Except for single MRSA biofilms, all microorganisms in both growth conditions secreted proteinase and phospholipase-C. SEM images revealed extensive adherence of bacteria to hyphal elements of C. albicans. C. albicans, MSSA, and MRSA can co-exist in biofilms without antagonism and in an apparent synergistic effect, with bacteria cells preferentially associated to C. albicans hyphal forms.

Indexed as

BiofilmsMicrobial InteractionsBacterial AdhesionBiomassCandida albicansExtracellular SpaceHydrolysisMetabolomeMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMitochondriaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID25875834
PMCPMC4395328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.