Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25875620›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

DNA barcoding evaluation and its taxonomic implications in the species-rich genus Primula L. in China.

Hai-Fei Yan, Yun-Jiao Liu, Xiu-Feng Xie, Cai-Yun Zhang, Chi-Ming Hu, Gang Hao, Xue-Jun Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chloroplast genomes of nineFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Concise Review ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. The complete plastome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Complete plastid genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. PhytoKeys · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Fei YanKey Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yun-Jiao LiuCollege of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiu-Feng XieTropical Agriculture department, Guangdong Agriculture Industry Business Polytechnic College, Guangzhou, China.
Cai-Yun ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Chi-Ming HuKey Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Gang HaoCollege of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xue-Jun GeKey Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNSouth China Botanical Garden · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangdong Industry Technical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Primula is extremely diverse in the east Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains (HHM) in China as a result of rapid radiation. In order to overcome the difficulty of morphological classification of this genus, we surveyed three plastid regions (rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA) and two nuclear markers (ITS and ITS2) from 227 accessions representing 66 Primula species across 18 sections, to assess their discriminatory power as barcodes. We found that ITS alone or combined with plastid regions showed the best discrimination across different infrageneric ranks and at species level. We suggest rbcL + matK + ITS as the first choice at present to barcode Primula plants. Although the present barcoding combination performed poorly in many closely related species of Primula, it still provided many new insights into current Primula taxonomy, such as the underlying presence of cryptic species, and several potential improper taxonomic treatments. DNA barcoding is one useful technique in the integrative taxonomy of the genus Primula, but it still requires further efforts to improve its effectiveness in some taxonomically challenging groups.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicChinaDNA, PlantDNA, Ribosomal SpacerPhylogenyPlastidsPrimulaSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA, PlantDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID25875620
PMCPMC4395239
OpenAlexW2055129293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.