ArticlePloS one2015
Crickets are not a free lunch: protein capture from scalable organic side-streams via high-density populations of Acheta domesticus.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.
- Farmed cricket performance remains stable over five generations of rearing on a waste-based diet.Journal of economic entomology · 2026Article
- Effect of Supplementing a Cricket Diet with Cooked Green Beans, a Discarded Agro-Industrial Material, on Performance ofInsects · 2026Article
- Comparing meat alternatives for a sustainable food system.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Tuning Gelation of Insect Proteins: Effect of Ionic Strength onGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Responses of house crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) to various dietary gross energy levels: effects on growth performance and nutrient deposition.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- Green Processes for Chitin and Chitosan Production from Insects: Current State, Challenges, and Opportunities.Polymers · 2025Review
- Chains of Commerce: A Comprehensive Review of Animal Welfare Impacts in the International Wildlife Trade.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Weeds and agro by-products for sustainable farming of edible field cricket, Gryllus madagascarensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Growth Performance and Environmental Impact ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains.NPJ science of food · 2024Review
- Production, consumption, and market supply of edible crickets: insights from East Africa.Agricultural and food economics · 2023Article
- Suitability of maize crop residue fermented byFrontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Utilization of Agro-Industrial Residues in the Rearing and Nutritional Enrichment ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Production Performance and Nutrient Conversion Efficiency of Field Cricket (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Predicting black soldier fly larvae biomass and methionine accumulation using a kinetic model for batch cultivation and improving system performance using semi-batch cultivation.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a teaching unit on the willingness to consume insect-based food - An intervention study with adolescents from Germany.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Review
- Insects' Production, Consumption, Policy, and Sustainability: What Have We Learned from the Indigenous Knowledge Systems?Insects · 2021Review
- A Proteomic- and Bioinformatic-Based Identification of Specific Allergens from Edible Insects: Probes for Future Detection as Food Ingredients.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been suggested that the ecological impact of crickets as a source of dietary protein is less than conventional forms of livestock due to their comparatively efficient feed conversion and ability to consume organic side-streams. This study measured the biomass output and feed conversion ratios of house crickets (Acheta domesticus) reared on diets that varied in quality, ranging from grain-based to highly cellulosic diets. The measurements were made at a much greater population scale and density than any previously reported in the scientific literature. The biomass accumulation was strongly influenced by the quality of the diet (p<0.001), with the nitrogen (N) content, the ratio of N to acid detergent fiber (ADF) content, and the crude fat (CF) content (y=N/ADF+CF) explaining most of the variability between feed treatments (p = 0.02; R2 = 0.96). In addition, for populations of crickets that were able to survive to a harvestable size, the feed conversion ratios measured were higher (less efficient) than those reported from studies conducted at smaller scales and lower population densities. Compared to the industrial-scale production of chickens, crickets fed a poultry feed diet showed little improvement in protein conversion efficiency, a key metric in determining the ecological footprint of grain-based livestock protein. Crickets fed the solid filtrate from food waste processed at an industrial scale via enzymatic digestion were able to reach a harvestable size and achieve feed and protein efficiencies similar to that of chickens. However, crickets fed minimally-processed, municipal-scale food waste and diets composed largely of straw experienced >99% mortality without reaching a harvestable size. Therefore, the potential for A. domesticus to sustainably supplement the global protein supply, beyond what is currently produced via grain-fed chickens, will depend on capturing regionally scalable organic side-streams of relatively high-quality that are not currently being used for livestock production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.