Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Differences in access to services in rural emergency departments of Quebec and Ontario.

Richard Fleet, Christina Pelletier, Jérémie Marcoux, Julie Maltais-Giguère, Patrick Archambault, Louis David Audette, Jeff Plant, François Bégin, Fatoumata Korika Tounkara, Julien Poitras

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04093245 (Supporting the Creation of a LEARNing INteGrated Health System to Mobilize Context-adapted Knowledge With a Wiki Platform to Improve the Transitions of Frail Seniors From From Hospitals and Emergency Departments to the cOMmunity), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04093245 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Supporting the Creation of a LEARNing INteGrated Health System to Mobilize Context-adapted Knowledge With a Wiki Platform to Improve the Transitions of Frail Seniors From From Hospitals and Emergency Departments to the cOMmunity: Phase II

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled4,000ConditionsTransition, Emergencies, Health Care Utilization, FrailtyArmsGEM nurse, pre- and post-hospitalization medication list reconciliation, systematic discharge summaries, medical follow-up appointment, follow-up phone call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Imperative for a health-centred focus on climate change in radiology.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Factors influencing community intensive care unit research participation: a qualitative descriptive study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard FleetDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada; Research Chair in Emergency Medicine, Laval University-CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis City, Quebec, Canada.
Christina PelletierDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Jérémie MarcouxDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Julie Maltais-GiguèreResearch Chair in Emergency Medicine, Laval University-CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis City, Quebec, Canada.
Patrick ArchambaultDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada; Research Chair in Emergency Medicine, Laval University-CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis City, Quebec, Canada.
Louis David AudetteDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Jeff PlantFaculty of medicine, University of British Columbia and Department of Emergency Medicine, Penticton regional Hospital, Penticton, British Columbia, Canada.
François BéginDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Fatoumata Korika TounkaraResearch Chair in Emergency Medicine, Laval University-CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis City, Quebec, Canada.
Julien PoitrasDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Quebec, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, CSSS Alphonse Desjardins-Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Hospital, Lévis, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRural emergency departments (EDs) are important safety nets for the 20% of Canadians who live there. A serious problem in access to health care services in these regions has emerged. However, there are considerable geographic disparities in access to trauma center in Canada. The main objective of this project was to compare access to local 24/7 support services in rural EDs in Quebec and Ontario as well as distances to Levels 1 and 2 trauma centers. MATERIALS AND

methodsRural EDs were identified through the Canadian Healthcare Association's Guide to Canadian Healthcare Facilities. We selected hospitals with 24/7 ED physician coverage and hospitalization beds that were located in rural communities. There were 26 rural EDs in Quebec and 62 in Ontario meeting these criteria. Data were collected from ministries of health, local health authorities, and ED statistics. Fisher's exact test, the t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, were performed to compare rural EDs of Quebec and Ontario.

resultsAll selected EDs of Quebec and Ontario agreed to participate in the study. The number of EDs visits was higher in Quebec than in Ontario (19 322 ± 6 275 vs 13 446 ± 8 056, p = 0.0013). There were no significant differences between Quebec and Ontario's local population and small town population density. Quebec's EDs have better access to advance imaging services such as CT scanner (77% vs 15%, p < .0001) and most the consultant support and ICU (92% vs 31%, p < .0001). Finally, more than 40% of rural EDs in Quebec and Ontario are more than 300 km away from Levels 1 and 2 trauma centers.

conclusionsConsidering that Canada has a Universal health care system, the discrepancies between Quebec and Ontario in access to support services are intriguing. A nationwide study is justified to address this issue.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth Services AccessibilityHumansOntarioPhysiciansQuebecRural Health ServicesRural PopulationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25874948
PMCPMC4398492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.