Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Health and economic outcomes of introducing the new MenB vaccine (Bexsero) into the Italian routine infant immunisation programme.

Marcello Tirani, Michela Meregaglia, Alessia Melegaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Lifecycle model-based evaluation of infant 4CMenB vaccination in the UK.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  5. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  6. [Health Technology Assessment of meningococcal B vaccine (TrumenbaJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Optimal use of meningococcal serogroup B vaccines: moving beyond outbreak control.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2018
    Review
  11. Societal costs due to meningococcal disease: a national registry-based study.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello TiraniPostgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Michela MeregagliaCeRGAS-Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Alessia MelegaroDepartment of Policy Analysis and Public Management & Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Bocconi University · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn January 2013 a novel type of multicomponent protein-based vaccine against group B meningococcal disease was licensed by the European Medicines Agency. With the widespread use of the meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccines, serogroup B remains now the major cause of bacterial meningitis and septicaemia in young children in Europe. The aim of this study is to investigate the health and the economic outcomes of MenB vaccine introduction into the Italian routine mass vaccination programme.

methodsThe present work is structured in two main parts. Firstly, we assess the epidemiological burden of group B meningococcal disease using official hospitalisation and notification data from two of the most populated Italian regions (Lombardia and Piemonte) during a 6-year study period (2007-2012). Secondly, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the immunisation programme in Italy from the public health payer perspective under base case parameters assumptions and performing a comprehensive sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness and the uncertainty of our model results.

resultsMenB serotype is responsible for 59% of the 341 cases of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Lombardia and Piemonte. Incidence rate for MenB infection is estimated to be 0.21/100,000/y resulting at the highest level in children ≤4 years of age. Although the new MenB vaccine can potentially prevent about one third of the disease cases in the Italian population, model results show this strategy is unlikely to be cost-effective (ICER value over €350,000/QALY) with a vaccine that prevents disease only. These results are robust under most of the sensitivity scenarios except when allowing for lower discount rates. DISCUSSION: The introduction of the novel vaccine into the routine immunisation schedule needs to be carefully evaluated. The new MenB vaccine has the potential to reduce the disease burden at the population level. However, from the Italian Health Service perspective, the immunisation programme is unlikely to be cost-effective at the current incidence levels and vaccine price.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornItalyMaleMeningitis, BacterialMeningococcal Vaccines4CMenB vaccineMeningococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25874805
PMCPMC4395261
OpenAlexW1966875484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.