Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874802›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of three treatments in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Ling-Xiao Chen, Yu-Lin Li, Guang-Zhi Ning, Yan Li, Qiu-Li Wu, Jin-Xiu Guo, Hong-Yu Shi, Xiao-Bo Wang, Yong Zhou, Shi-Qing Feng

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the elderly: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a review of reviews and recommendations for the non-invasive management of acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture pain in low- and middle-income communities.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A network meta-analysis for efficacies and toxicities of different therapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ling-Xiao ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Lin LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Guang-Zhi NingDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Yan LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Qiu-Li WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Xiu GuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Yu ShiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Bo WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Yong ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.
Shi-Qing FengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe question which kind of methods is most suitable for treating the old people for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is still discussed and pairwise meta-analyses cannot get hierarchies of these treatments. Our aim is to integrate the evidence to provide hierarchies of the comparative efficacy measured by the change of VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and tolerability measured by incidence of new fractures and risk of all-cause discontinuation on three treatments (percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)、balloon kyphoplasty (BK) and conservative treatment (CT)).

methodsWe performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments for the old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Amed, British Nursing Index, Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google scholar, SIGLE, the National Technical Information Service, the National Research Register (UK) and the Current Controlled Trials databases. Data from three outcomes (e.g. VAS, risk of all-cause discontinuation and incidence of new fractures) were independently extracted by two authors.

resultsA total of five RCTs were finally included into this article. PVP and BK significantly decreased VAS when compared with CT. BK had a significantly lower risk of all-cause discontinuation contrast to CT. Three treatments (BK, PVP and CT) had no significant differences in the incidence of new fractures.

conclusionsPVP may be the best way to relieve pain, CT might lead to the lowest incidence of new fractures and BK might had the lowest risk of all-cause discontinuation in old people with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. More large-scale and longer duration of follow-up studies are needed.

Indexed as

AgedBayes TheoremFemaleFractures, CompressionHumansKyphoplastyMaleOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSpinal FracturesTreatment OutcomeVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID25874802
PMCPMC4395314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.