Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874731›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Exploring the opportunities for food and drink purchasing and consumption by teenagers during their journeys between home and school: a feasibility study using a novel method.

Gill Cowburn, Anne Matthews, Aiden Doherty, Alex Hamilton, Paul Kelly, Julianne Williams, Charlie Foster, Michael Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modified ground-truthing: an accurate and cost-effective food environment validation method for town and rural areas.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gill Cowburn1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK.
Anne Matthews1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK.
Aiden Doherty1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK.
Alex Hamilton1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK.
Paul Kelly2Physical Activity for Health Research Centre,Moray House School of Education,University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh,UK.
Julianne Williams1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK.
Charlie Foster1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK.
Michael Nelson3Public Health Nutrition Research (formerly Children's Food Trust),London,UK.

Funding

BLRD VA I01 BX001000British Heart Foundation BX1000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the feasibility and acceptability of using wearable cameras as a method to capture the opportunities for food and drink purchasing/consumption that young people encounter on their regular journeys to and from school.

designA qualitative study using multiple data-collection methods including wearable cameras, global positioning system units, individual interviews, food and drink purchase and consumption diaries completed by participants over four days, and an audit of food outlets located within an 800 m Euclidean buffer zone around each school.

settingA community setting. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two students (fourteen girls and eight boys) aged 13-15 years recruited from four secondary schools in two counties of England.

resultsWearable cameras offered a feasible and acceptable method for collecting food purchase and consumption data when used alongside traditional methods of data collection in a small number of teenagers. We found evidence of participants making deliberate choices about whether or not to purchase/consume food and drink on their journeys. These choices were influenced by priorities over money, friends, journey length, travel mode and ease of access to opportunities for purchase/consumption. Most food and drink items were purchased/consumed within an 800 m Euclidean buffer around school, with items commonly selected being high in energy, fat and sugar. Wearable camera images combined with interviews helped identify unreported items and misreporting errors.

conclusionsWearable camera images prompt detailed discussion and generate contextually specific information which could offer new insights and understanding around eating behaviour patterns. The feasibility of scaling up the use of these methods requires further empirical work.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorFeeding BehaviorAdolescentBeveragesChoice BehaviorData CollectionFeasibility StudiesFemaleFood PreferencesFood ServicesHumansMaleSchoolsSnacksStudentsTravelAdolescentsFood and drink purchase and consumptionMethodsSchoolWearable cameras

Identifiers

PMID25874731
PMCPMC10271163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.