ArticleSystematic reviews2015
Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Mapping variation in intervention design: a systematic review to develop a program theory for patient navigator programs.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Understanding Patient Navigation Functions: A Qualitative Exploration of Navigators' Perspectives in Alberta, Canada.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Medical manifestations and health care utilization among adult MyCode participants with neurodevelopmental psychiatric copy number variants.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- Examining Facilitators and Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence in a Low-Resource Setting in Latin America from Multiple Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- What do people with lung cancer and stroke expect from patient navigation? A qualitative study in Germany.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Leveraging the Electronic Health Records for Population Health: A Case Study of Patients With Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- A Stepped Care Model of Patient Navigation to Enhance Engagement with Perinatal Mental Health Care.Health equity · 2020Article
- Nurse Navigator: development of a program for Brazil.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020Article
- Article
- Patient navigation across the spectrum of women's health care in the United States.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Review
- A structural equation model of patient-healthcare provider relationships and HIV-infected patient outcomes in Chinese populations.AIDS care · 2018Article
- Article
- Patient navigation to improve diabetes outpatient care at a safety-net hospital: a retrospective cohort study.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Exploring the impact of financial barriers on secondary prevention of heart disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2017Article
- Life begins at 60: Identifying the social support needs of African American women aging with HIV.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2017Article
- What is the scope of improving immigrant and ethnic minority healthcare using community navigators: A systematic scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with chronic diseases may have difficulty optimizing their health and getting the care they need due to a combination of patient, provider, and health system level barriers. Patient navigator programs, in which trained personnel assess and assist patients in overcoming barriers to care, may improve care and outcomes for patients with chronic disease by providing an alternative approach to conventional information and support resources.
methodsThis systematic review will evaluate the evidence for patient navigator programs, compared to usual care, in patients with chronic disease. We will include RCTs, cluster RCTs, and quasi-randomized RCTs that study the effects of patient navigator programs on clinical outcomes, patient experience, and markers of adherence to care. Studies will be identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and the references of included studies. Two authors will screen titles and abstracts independently. Full texts will be reviewed for relevance and data extraction will be done independently by two authors. Studies will be included if they assess patients of any age with one or more chronic diseases. Outcomes will be categorized into groups characterized by their proximity to mechanism of action of the intervention: patient-level outcomes, intermediate outcomes, and process outcomes. Descriptive data about the elements of the patient navigator intervention will also be collected for potential subgroup analyses. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) risk of bias tool. Data will be analyzed using random effects meta-analysis (relative risk for dichotomous data and mean difference for continuous data), if appropriate. DISCUSSION: A comprehensive review of patient navigator programs, including a summary of the elements of programs that are associated with a successful intervention, does not yet exist. This systematic review will synthesize the evidence of the effect of patient navigator interventions on clinical and patient-oriented outcomes in populations across a comprehensive set of chronic diseases. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005857 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.