Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874724›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2015

Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elizabeth Kelly, Noah Ivers, Rami Zawi, Lianne Barnieh, Braden Manns, Diane L Lorenzetti, David Nicholas, Marcello Tonelli, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Richard Lewanczuk and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nurse Navigator: development of a program for Brazil.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth KellyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, G012, Health Sciences Centre, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4 N1, Canada. ejkelly@ucalgary.ca.
Noah IversDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 77 Grenville Street 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B3, Canada. noah.ivers@utoronto.ca.
Rami ZawiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 77 Grenville Street 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B3, Canada. rami.zawi@hotmail.com.
Lianne BarniehDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2 T9, Canada. lbarnieh@gmail.com.
Braden MannsDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2 T9, Canada. Braden.Manns@albertahealthservices.ca.
Diane L LorenzettiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. dllorenz@ucalgary.ca.
David NicholasFaculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, 2800 University Way NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1 N4, Canada. nicholas@ucalgary.ca.
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2 T9, Canada. cello@ucalgary.ca.
Brenda HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2 T9, Canada. Brenda.Hemmelgarn@albertahealthservices.ca.
Richard LewanczukDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, 362 HMRC, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2S2, Canada. Richard.Lewanczuk@albertahealthservices.ca.
Alun EdwardsDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2 T9, Canada. Alun.Edwards@albertahealthservices.ca.
Ted BraunDepartment of Family Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Sheldon M. Chumir Health Centre, 8th Floor, 1213 - 4th Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2R 0X7, Canada. Ted.Braun@albertahealthservices.ca.
Kerry A McBrienDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, G012, Health Sciences Centre, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4 N1, Canada. kerry.mcbrien@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with chronic diseases may have difficulty optimizing their health and getting the care they need due to a combination of patient, provider, and health system level barriers. Patient navigator programs, in which trained personnel assess and assist patients in overcoming barriers to care, may improve care and outcomes for patients with chronic disease by providing an alternative approach to conventional information and support resources.

methodsThis systematic review will evaluate the evidence for patient navigator programs, compared to usual care, in patients with chronic disease. We will include RCTs, cluster RCTs, and quasi-randomized RCTs that study the effects of patient navigator programs on clinical outcomes, patient experience, and markers of adherence to care. Studies will be identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and the references of included studies. Two authors will screen titles and abstracts independently. Full texts will be reviewed for relevance and data extraction will be done independently by two authors. Studies will be included if they assess patients of any age with one or more chronic diseases. Outcomes will be categorized into groups characterized by their proximity to mechanism of action of the intervention: patient-level outcomes, intermediate outcomes, and process outcomes. Descriptive data about the elements of the patient navigator intervention will also be collected for potential subgroup analyses. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) risk of bias tool. Data will be analyzed using random effects meta-analysis (relative risk for dichotomous data and mean difference for continuous data), if appropriate. DISCUSSION: A comprehensive review of patient navigator programs, including a summary of the elements of programs that are associated with a successful intervention, does not yet exist. This systematic review will synthesize the evidence of the effect of patient navigator interventions on clinical and patient-oriented outcomes in populations across a comprehensive set of chronic diseases. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42013005857 .

Indexed as

Chronic DiseasePatient NavigationClinical ProtocolsHealth StatusHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25874724
PMCPMC4375835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.