Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874566›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A 90-day toxicology study of meat from genetically modified sheep overexpressing TLR4 in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Hai Bai, Zhixian Wang, Rui Hu, Tongtong Kan, Yan Li, Xiaosheng Zhang, Jinlong Zhang, Ling Lian, Hongbing Han, Zhengxing Lian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A 90-Day Safety Study of Meat fromLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the effect ofJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hai BaiBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China; School of Life Science, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, Shanxi, P. R. China.
Zhixian WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Rui HuBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Tongtong KanBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yan LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xiaosheng ZhangTianjin Institute of Animal Sciences, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Jinlong ZhangTianjin Institute of Animal Sciences, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Ling LianBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Hongbing HanBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Zhengxing LianBeijing Key Laboratory of Animal Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
China Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Animal Sciences · CNShanxi Datong University · CNTianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic modification offers alternative strategies to traditional animal breeding. However, the food safety of genetically modified (GM) animals has attracted increasing levels of concern. In this study, we produced GM sheep overexpressing TLR4, and the transgene-positive offsprings (F1) were confirmed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blot. The expression of TLR4 was 2.5-fold compared with that of the wild-type (WT) sheep samples. During the 90-day safety study, Sprague-Dawley rats were fed with three different dietary concentrations (3.75%, 7.5%, and 15% wt/wt) of GM sheep meat, WT sheep meat or a commercial diet (CD). Blood samples from the rats were collected and analyzed for hematological and biochemical parameters, and then compared with hematological and biochemical reference ranges. Despite a few significant differences among the three groups in some parameters, all other values remained within the normal reference intervals and thus were not considered to be affected by the treatment. No adverse diet-related differences in body weights or relative organ weights were observed. Furthermore, no differences were observed in the gross necropsy findings or microscopic pathology of the rats whose diets contained the GM sheep meat compared with rats whose diets contained the WT sheep meat. Therefore, the present 90-day rat feeding study suggested that the meat of GM sheep overexpressing TLR4 had no adverse effect on Sprague-Dawley rats in comparison with WT sheep meat. These results provide valuable information regarding the safety assessment of meat derived from GM animals.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBody WeightFood, Genetically ModifiedHematologic TestsHumansKidneyLiverMaleMeatMolecular Sequence DataOrgan SizeRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySheepToll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID25874566
PMCPMC4395235
OpenAlexW2083536703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.