Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874555›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Cell type-specific separation of subicular principal neurons during network activities.

Joanna Eller, Shota Zarnadze, Peter Bäuerle, Tamar Dugladze, Tengis Gloveli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coupling of Sharp Wave Events between Zebrafish Hippocampal and Amygdala Homologs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Functional Diversity of Subicular Principal Cells during Hippocampal Ripples.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanna EllerCellular and Network Physiology Group, Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Shota ZarnadzeCellular and Network Physiology Group, Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Peter BäuerleCellular and Network Physiology Group, Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tamar DugladzeCellular and Network Physiology Group, Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Cluster of excellence "NeuroCure", Berlin, Germany.
Tengis GloveliCellular and Network Physiology Group, Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hippocampal output structure, the subiculum, expresses two major memory relevant network rhythms, sharp wave ripple and gamma frequency oscillations. To this date, it remains unclear how the two distinct types of subicular principal cells, intrinsically bursting and regular spiking neurons, participate in these two network rhythms. Using concomitant local field potential and intracellular recordings in an in vitro mouse model that allows the investigation of both network rhythms, we found a cell type-specific segregation of principal neurons into participating intrinsically bursting and non-participating regular spiking cells. However, if regular spiking cells were kept at a more depolarized level, they did participate in a specific manner, suggesting a potential bimodal working model dependent on the level of excitation. Furthermore, intrinsically bursting and regular spiking cells exhibited divergent intrinsic membrane and synaptic properties in the active network. Thus, our results suggest a cell-type-specific segregation of principal cells into two separate groups during network activities, supporting the idea of two parallel streams of information processing within the subiculum.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleHippocampusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSynapses

Identifiers

PMID25874555
PMCPMC4396839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.