ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2015
Metaproteomics of complex microbial communities in biogas plants.
Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Peptonizer2000: Bringing Confidence to Metaproteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Exploring the mechanisms of supplemented COBioengineered · 2025Review
- Metaproteomics in the One Health framework for unraveling microbial effectors in microbiomes.Microbiome · 2025Review
- Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Bioinformatic Workflows for Metaproteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Metaproteomic Analysis of Biogas Plants: A Complete Workflow from Lab to Bioinformatics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Proteomic analysis to unravel the biochemical mechanisms triggered by Bacillus toyonensis SFC 500-1E under chromium(VI) and phenol stress.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023Review
- Uncovering Microbiome Adaptations in a Full-Scale Biogas Plant: Insights from MAG-Centric Metagenomics and Metaproteomics.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Impact of innovative nanoadditives on biodigesters microbiome.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
- Taxonomical composition and functional analysis of biofilms sampled from a nuclear storage pool.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Comparative Proteomic Analysis of an Ethyl Tert-Butyl Ether-Degrading Bacterial Consortium.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Adaptation of a microbial community to demand-oriented biological methanation.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- In silico evaluation of a targeted metaproteomics strategy for broad screening of cellulolytic enzyme capacities in anaerobic microbiome bioreactors.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- New opportunities in plant microbiome engineering for increasing agricultural sustainability under stressful conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Molecular Microbial Community Analysis as an Analysis Tool for Optimal Biogas Production.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- The Role ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- ANPELA: analysis and performance assessment of the label-free quantification workflow for metaproteomic studies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Impact of process temperature and organic loading rate on cellulolytic / hydrolytic biofilm microbiomes during biomethanation of ryegrass silage revealed by genome-centered metagenomics and metatranscriptomics.Environmental microbiome · 2020Article
- Metaproteome analysis reveals that syntrophy, competition, and phage-host interaction shape microbial communities in biogas plants.Microbiome · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Production of biogas from agricultural biomass or organic wastes is an important source of renewable energy. Although thousands of biogas plants (BGPs) are operating in Germany, there is still a significant potential to improve yields, e.g. from fibrous substrates. In addition, process stability should be optimized. Besides evaluating technical measures, improving our understanding of microbial communities involved into the biogas process is considered as key issue to achieve both goals. Microscopic and genetic approaches to analyse community composition provide valuable experimental data, but fail to detect presence of enzymes and overall metabolic activity of microbial communities. Therefore, metaproteomics can significantly contribute to elucidate critical steps in the conversion of biomass to methane as it delivers combined functional and phylogenetic data. Although metaproteomics analyses are challenged by sample impurities, sample complexity and redundant protein identification, and are still limited by the availability of genome sequences, recent studies have shown promising results. In the following, the workflow and potential pitfalls for metaproteomics of samples from full-scale BGP are discussed. In addition, the value of metaproteomics to contribute to the further advancement of microbial ecology is evaluated. Finally, synergistic effects expected when metaproteomics is combined with advanced imaging techniques, metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and metabolomics are addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.