ReviewBioMed research international2015
Evolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyond.
Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- The average individual genome: a survey of nearly 1 million whole-genome sequences.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing Molecular Diagnostic Accuracy in Genetic Eye Disorders Through a Personalized Re-Evaluation Strategy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Clinical risk factors predicting likelihood of pathogenic genetic result in NICU patients.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Beyond the standard: a comprehensive review of innovative experimental models using Tenebrio molitor larvae.Biologia futura · 2025Review
- From tradition to transformation: evolving models of care in clinical genetics.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Precision diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- The continued promise of genomic technologies and software in neurogenetics.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025Review
- Bacteriophage-based therapies in oral cancer: A new frontier in oncology.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Review
- Article
- Tumor Mutations in Minority Populations Versus Non-Hispanic Whites Across Tumor Types.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Nanoparticle-assisted PCR: fundamentals, mechanisms, and forensic implications.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
- Characterizing trends in clinical genetic testing: A single-center analysis of EHR data from 1.8 million patients over two decades.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Unleashing the Power of Multiomics: Unraveling the Molecular Landscape of Peripheral Neuropathy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Review
- Genome-Based Advances in Modeling Renal Ciliopathies and Enhancing Patient Care.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2025Review
- The genetic technologies questionnaire in the Greek-speaking population: the moral judgement of the lay public.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Decoding the genetic landscape of autism: A comprehensive review.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2024Article
- Knowledge of genetics and attitudes toward genetic testing among university students in Indonesia.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- The expanding diagnostic toolbox for rare genetic diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Ancient Diseases in Vertebrates: Tumours through the Ages.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Aspiring toward equitable benefits from genomic advances to individuals of ancestrally diverse backgrounds.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetics is the study of heredity, which means the study of genes and factors related to all aspects of genes. The scientific history of genetics began with the works of Gregor Mendel in the mid-19th century. Prior to Mendel, genetics was primarily theoretical whilst, after Mendel, the science of genetics was broadened to include experimental genetics. Developments in all fields of genetics and genetic technology in the first half of the 20th century provided a basis for the later developments. In the second half of the 20th century, the molecular background of genetics has become more understandable. Rapid technological advancements, followed by the completion of Human Genome Project, have contributed a great deal to the knowledge of genetic factors and their impact on human life and diseases. Currently, more than 1800 disease genes have been identified, more than 2000 genetic tests have become available, and in conjunction with this at least 350 biotechnology-based products have been released onto the market. Novel technologies, particularly next generation sequencing, have dramatically accelerated the pace of biological research, while at the same time increasing expectations. In this paper, a brief summary of genetic history with short explanations of most popular genetic techniques is given.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.