Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25874174›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology journal2015

Clinical and biochemical outcomes of men undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

David Schreiber, Justin Rineer, Jeffrey P Weiss, Joseph Safdieh, Joseph Weiner, Marvin Rotman, David Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David SchreiberDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Justin RineerUniversity of Florida Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA.
Jeffrey P WeissDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Joseph SafdiehDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Joseph WeinerDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Marvin RotmanDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
David SchwartzDepartment of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, NY, USA. ; SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe analyzed outcomes of patients with prostate cancer undergoing either radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) +/- salvage radiation or definitive radiation therapy (RT) +/- androgen deprivation. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 2003-2010 there were 251 patients who underwent RRP and 469 patients who received RT (≥7,560 cGy) for prostate cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with the log-rank test to compare biochemical control (bCR), distant metastatic-free survival (DMPFS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) between the two groups.

resultsThe median follow-up was 70 months and 61.3% of the men were African American. For low risk disease the 6-year bCR were 90.3% for RT and 85.6% for RRP (p = 0.23) and the 6-year post-salvage bCR were 90.3% vs. 90.9%, respectively (p = 0.84). For intermediate risk disease the 6-year bCR were 82.6% for RT and 59.7% for RRP (p < 0.001) and 82.6% vs. 74.0%, respectively, after including those salvaged with RT (p = 0.06). For high risk disease, the 6-year bCR were 67.4% for RT and 41.3% for RRP (p < 0.001) and after including those salvaged with RT was 67.4% vs. 43.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to DMPFS or PCSS.

conclusionTreatment approaches utilizing RRP +/- salvage radiation or RT +/- androgen deprivation yielded equivalent DMPFS and PCSS outcomes. Biochemical control rates, using their respective definitions, appeared equivalent or better in those who received treatment with RT.

Indexed as

Comparative effectivenessDose escalationOutcomesProstate cancerRadiation therapyRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID25874174
PMCPMC4394065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.