ReviewGenetics research international2015
Unlimited Thirst for Genome Sequencing, Data Interpretation, and Database Usage in Genomic Era: The Road towards Fast-Track Crop Plant Improvement.
Review in Genetics research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Genomic SSR Markers to Reveal the Genetic Diversity in Trichosanthes kirilowii from Korea.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- Selection of superior Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes from seedling-originated trees in the North-Western Himalayan region based on morphological characterization using multivariate analysis.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetic diversity of pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.) from western Kenya using SSR molecular markers.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- Marker-assisted selection strategy to pyramid two or more QTLs for quantitative trait-grain yield under drought.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Growing and cultivating the forest genomics database, TreeGenes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Plant Promoter Analysis: Identification and Characterization of Root Nodule Specific Promoter in the Common Bean.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Computational Tools for Genomic Studies in Plants.Current genomics · 2016Article
- Bioinformatics Approach in Plant Genomic Research.Current genomics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of sequenced crop genomes and associated genomic resources is growing rapidly with the advent of inexpensive next generation sequencing methods. Databases have become an integral part of all aspects of science research, including basic and applied plant and animal sciences. The importance of databases keeps increasing as the volume of datasets from direct and indirect genomics, as well as other omics approaches, keeps expanding in recent years. The databases and associated web portals provide at a minimum a uniform set of tools and automated analysis across a wide range of crop plant genomes. This paper reviews some basic terms and considerations in dealing with crop plant databases utilization in advancing genomic era. The utilization of databases for variation analysis with other comparative genomics tools, and data interpretation platforms are well described. The major focus of this review is to provide knowledge on platforms and databases for genome-based investigations of agriculturally important crop plants. The utilization of these databases in applied crop improvement program is still being achieved widely; otherwise, the end for sequencing is not far away.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.