Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873896›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2015

A pretargeting system for tumor PET imaging and radioimmunotherapy.

Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Caroline Rousseau, Caroline Bodet-Milin, Eric Frampas, Alain Faivre-Chauvet, Aurore Rauscher, Robert M Sharkey, David M Goldenberg, Jean-François Chatal, Jacques Barbet

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical research analysis of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pretargeting: A Path Forward for Radioimmunotherapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Pretargeted radioimmunoimaging with a biotinylated D-DThe Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. PET Imaging of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Françoise Kraeber-BodéréNuclear Medicine Department, Nantes University Hospital Nantes, France ; Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau Nantes, France ; Cancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France.
Caroline RousseauNuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau Nantes, France ; Cancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France.
Caroline Bodet-MilinNuclear Medicine Department, Nantes University Hospital Nantes, France ; Cancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France.
Eric FrampasCancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France ; Radiology Department, Nantes University Hospital Nantes, France.
Alain Faivre-ChauvetNuclear Medicine Department, Nantes University Hospital Nantes, France ; Cancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France.
Aurore RauscherNuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau Nantes, France ; Cancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France.
Robert M SharkeyImmunomedics, Inc. Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
David M GoldenbergImmunomedics, Inc. Morris Plains, NJ, USA ; Garden State Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
Jean-François ChatalGIP Arronax Saint-Herblain, France.
Jacques BarbetCancer Research Center, University of Nantes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Nantes, France ; GIP Arronax Saint-Herblain, France.
Nantes Université · FRImmunomedics (United States) · USInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégrée Nantes Angers · FRInstitut Génétique Nantes Atlantique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Labeled antibodies, as well as their fragments and antibody-derived recombinant constructs, have long been proposed as general vectors to target radionuclides to tumor lesions for imaging and therapy. They have indeed shown promise in both imaging and therapeutic applications, but they have not fulfilled the original expectations of achieving sufficient image contrast for tumor detection or sufficient radiation dose delivered to tumors for therapy. Pretargeting was originally developed for tumor immunoscintigraphy. It was assumed that directly-radiolabled antibodies could be replaced by an unlabeled immunoconjugate capable of binding both a tumor-specific antigen and a small molecular weight molecule. The small molecular weight molecule would carry the radioactive payload and would be injected after the bispecific immunoconjugate. It has been demonstrated that this approach does allow for both antibody-specific recognition and fast clearance of the radioactive molecule, thus resulting in improved tumor-to-normal tissue contrast ratios. It was subsequently shown that pretargeting also held promise for tumor therapy, translating improved tumor-to-normal tissue contrast ratios into more specific delivery of absorbed radiation doses. Many technical approaches have been proposed to implement pretargeting, and two have been extensively documented. One is based on the avidin-biotin system, and the other on bispecific antibodies binding a tumor-specific antigen and a hapten. Both have been studied in preclinical models, as well as in several clinical studies, and have shown improved targeting efficiency. This article reviews the historical and recent preclinical and clinical advances in the use of bispecific-antibody-based pretargeting for radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy of cancer. The results of recent evaluation of pretargeting in PET imaging also are discussed.

Indexed as

bispecific antibodyimmuno-PETimmunoscintigraphypretargetingradioimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25873896
PMCPMC4379897
OpenAlexW2015825998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.