Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015

Functional role of delta and theta band oscillations for auditory feedback processing during vocal pitch motor control.

Roozbeh Behroozmand, Nadine Ibrahim, Oleg Korzyukov, Donald A Robin, Charles R Larson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Aberrant modulation of broadband neural oscillations reflects vocal sensorimotor deficits in post-stroke aphasia.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roozbeh BehroozmandSpeech Neuroscience Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA.
Nadine IbrahimSpeech Physiology Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA.
Oleg KorzyukovSpeech Physiology Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA.
Donald A RobinDepartments of Neurology and Radiology, Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio San Antonio, TX, USA.
Charles R LarsonSpeech Physiology Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University Evanston, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms of Voice ControlR01DC006243 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, CHARLES R · 2004 to 2013
$4.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The answer to the question of how the brain incorporates sensory feedback and links it with motor function to achieve goal-directed movement during vocalization remains unclear. We investigated the mechanisms of voice pitch motor control by examining the spectro-temporal dynamics of EEG signals when non-musicians (NM), relative pitch (RP), and absolute pitch (AP) musicians maintained vocalizations of a vowel sound and received randomized ± 100 cents pitch-shift stimuli in their auditory feedback. We identified a phase-synchronized (evoked) fronto-central activation within the theta band (5-8 Hz) that temporally overlapped with compensatory vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback and was significantly stronger in RP and AP musicians compared with non-musicians. A second component involved a non-phase-synchronized (induced) frontal activation within the delta band (1-4 Hz) that emerged at approximately 1 s after the stimulus onset. The delta activation was significantly stronger in the NM compared with RP and AP groups and correlated with the pitch rebound error (PRE), indicating the degree to which subjects failed to re-adjust their voice pitch to baseline after the stimulus offset. We propose that the evoked theta is a neurophysiological marker of enhanced pitch processing in musicians and reflects mechanisms by which humans incorporate auditory feedback to control their voice pitch. We also suggest that the delta activation reflects adaptive neural processes by which vocal production errors are monitored and used to update the state of sensory-motor networks for driving subsequent vocal behaviors. This notion is corroborated by our findings showing that larger PREs were associated with greater delta band activity in the NM compared with RP and AP groups. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of auditory feedback processing for vocal pitch motor control.

Indexed as

absolute pitchauditory feedbackEEGneural oscillationsensory-motor integrationvocalizationvoice pitch controlwavelet analysis

Identifiers

PMID25873858
PMCPMC4379876
OpenAlexW2023376198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.