Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873673›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2015

Magnetic resonance imaging of sugar beet taproots in soil reveals growth reduction and morphological changes during foliar Cercospora beticola infestation.

Simone Schmittgen, Ralf Metzner, Dagmar Van Dusschoten, Marcus Jansen, Fabio Fiorani, Siegfried Jahnke, Uwe Rascher, Ulrich Schurr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotyping in Plants. Preface.Journal of experimental botany · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone SchmittgenForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany simone.schmittgen@julumni.fz-juelich.de s.jahnke@fz-juelich.de.
Ralf MetznerForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Dagmar Van DusschotenForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Marcus JansenForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Fabio FioraniForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Siegfried JahnkeForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany simone.schmittgen@julumni.fz-juelich.de s.jahnke@fz-juelich.de.
Uwe RascherForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Ulrich SchurrForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Bio-und Geowissenschaften, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) infection can cause severe yield loss in sugar beet. Introduction of Cercospora-resistant varieties in breeding programmes is important for plant protection to reduce both fungicide applications and the risk of the development of fungal resistance. However, in vivo monitoring of the sugar-containing taproots at early stages of foliar symptoms and the characterization of the temporal development of disease progression has proven difficult. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements were conducted to quantify taproot development of genotypes with high (HS) and low (LS) levels of susceptibility after foliar Cercospora inoculation. Fourteen days post-inoculation (dpi) the ratio of infected leaf area was still low (~7%) in both the HS and LS genotypes. However, during this period, the volumetric growth of the taproot had already started to decrease. Additionally, inoculated plants showed a reduction of the increase in width of inner cambial rings while the width of outer rings increased slightly compared with non-inoculated plants. This response partly compensated for the reduced development of inner rings that had a vascular connection with Cercospora-inoculated leaves. Hence, alterations in taproot anatomical features such as volume and cambial ring development can be non-invasively detected already at 14 dpi, providing information on the early impact of the infection on whole-plant performance. All these findings show that MRI is a suitable tool to identify promising candidate parent lines with improved resistance to Cercospora, for example with comparatively lower taproot growth reduction at early stages of canopy infection, for future introduction into breeing programmes.

Indexed as

AscomycotaBeta vulgarisCambiumMagnetic Resonance ImagingPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlant RootsBeta vulgarisCercospora beticolaCercospora leaf spotmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)morphological taproot changesnon-invasive phenotyping.

Identifiers

PMID25873673
PMCPMC4585413
OpenAlexW2159333108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.