Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873485›Full record

ArticleCancer research2015

NHANES 2009-2012 Findings: Association of Sexual Behaviors with Higher Prevalence of Oral Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infections in U.S. Men.

Anil K Chaturvedi, Barry I Graubard, Tatevik Broutian, Robert K L Pickard, Zhen-Yue Tong, Weihong Xiao, Lisa Kahle, Maura L Gillison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anil K ChaturvediDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Barry I GraubardDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Tatevik BroutianThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Robert K L PickardThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Zhen-Yue TongThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Weihong XiaoThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Lisa KahleInformation Management Services, Calverton, Maryland.
Maura L GillisonThe Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Maura.gillison@osumc.edu.

Funding

Studies of Head and Neck CancersZIACP010213 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI CHATURVEDI, ANIL · 2010 to 2025
$15.9M
PREVALENCE AND DETERMINANTS OF ORAL HPV INFECTION IN THE US POPULATIONR01DE023175 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SYMER, DAVID ERIC · 2012 to 2015
$3.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancers is higher and increasing more rapidly among men than women in the United States for unknown reasons. We compared the epidemiology of oral oncogenic HPV infection between men and women ages 14 to 69 years (N = 9,480) within the U.S. National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2009-2012. HPV presence was detected in oral DNA by PCR. Analyses were stratified by gender and used NHANES sample weights. Oral oncogenic HPV prevalence was higher among men than women (6.6% vs. 1.5%, P < 0.001), corresponding to 7.07 million men versus 1.54 million women with prevalent infection at any point in time during 2009-2012. Prevalence increased significantly with age, current smoking, and lifetime number of sexual partners for both genders (adjusted Ptrend < 0.02). However, men had more partners than women (mean = 18 vs. 7, P < 0.001). Although oncogenic HPV prevalence was similar for men and women with 0 to 1 lifetime partners, the male-female difference in prevalence significantly increased with number of lifetime partners (adjusted prevalence differences for none, 1, 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, and 20+ partners = 1.0%, 0.5%, 3.0%, 5.7%, 4.6%, and 9.3%, respectively). Importantly, the per-sexual partner increase in prevalence was significantly stronger among men than among women (adjusted synergy index = 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-9.7), and this increase plateaued at 25 lifetime partners among men versus 10 partners among women. Our data suggest that the higher burden of oral oncogenic HPV infections and HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers among men than women arises in part from higher number of lifetime sexual partners and stronger associations with sexual behaviors among men.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth DiseasesOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25873485
PMCPMC4470779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.