Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873374›Full record

Trial reportmBio2015

Functional dynamics of the gut microbiome in elderly people during probiotic consumption.

Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh, Arthur Brady, Jonathan Crabtree, Elliott F Drabek, Bing Ma, Anup Mahurkar, Jacques Ravel, Miriam Haverkamp, Anne-Maria Fiorino, Christine Botelho and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Vitamin BMicrobiome · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Safety and Potential Role ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emiley A Eloe-FadroshInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Arthur BradyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jonathan CrabtreeInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Elliott F DrabekInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Bing MaInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anup MahurkarInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jacques RavelInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Miriam HaverkampDivision of Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anne-Maria FiorinoDivision of Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christine BotelhoDivision of Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Irina AndreyevaDivision of Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Patricia L HibberdDivision of Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Claire M Frasercmfraser@som.umaryland.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Probiotics to Enhance Influenza Vaccine ImmunogenicityU01AT002952 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HIBBERD, PATRICIA L · 2010 to 2013
$2.8M
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (K24)K24AT003683 · NCCIH · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIBBERD, PATRICIA L · 2006 to 2015
$1.9M
Effects of Probiotics in Patients with Cystic FibrosisU01AT002388 · NCCIH · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIBBERD, PATRICIA L · 2006 to 2013
$1.3M
Probiotics to Eradicate Nasal S Aureus in ESRD PatientsU01AT002133 · NCCIH · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIBBERD, PATRICIA L · 2005 to 2011
$427k
NCCIH NIH HHS 3K24AT003683NCCIH NIH HHS 3U01AT002952NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT003683NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT002133NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT002388NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT002952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledA mechanistic understanding of the purported health benefits conferred by consumption of probiotic bacteria has been limited by our knowledge of the resident gut microbiota and its interaction with the host. Here, we detail the impact of a single-organism probiotic, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 (LGG), on the structure and functional dynamics (gene expression) of the gut microbiota in a study of 12 healthy individuals, 65 to 80 years old. The analysis revealed that while the overall community composition was stable as assessed by 16S rRNA profiling, the transcriptional response of the gut microbiota was modulated by probiotic treatment. Comparison of transcriptional profiles based on taxonomic composition yielded three distinct transcriptome groups that displayed considerable differences in functional dynamics. The transcriptional profile of LGG in vivo was remarkably concordant across study subjects despite the considerable interindividual nature of the gut microbiota. However, we identified genes involved in flagellar motility, chemotaxis, and adhesion from Bifidobacterium and the dominant butyrate producers Roseburia and Eubacterium whose expression was increased during probiotic consumption, suggesting that LGG may promote interactions between key constituents of the microbiota and the host epithelium. These results provide evidence for the discrete functional effects imparted by a specific single-organism probiotic and challenge the prevailing notion that probiotics substantially modify the resident microbiota within nondiseased individuals in an appreciable fashion. IMPORTANCE: Probiotic bacteria have been used for over a century to promote digestive health. Many individuals report that probiotics alleviate a number of digestive issues, yet little evidence links how probiotic microbes influence human health. Here, we show how the resident microbes that inhabit the healthy human gut respond to a probiotic. The well-studied probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 (LGG) was administered in a clinical trial, and a suite of measurements of the resident microbes were taken to evaluate potential changes over the course of probiotic consumption. We found that LGG transiently enriches for functions to potentially promote anti-inflammatory pathways in the resident microbes.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobial InteractionsPhylogenyAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleGastrointestinal TractGene Expression ProfilingHumansLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusMaleMolecular Sequence DataProbioticsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25873374
PMCPMC4453556
OpenAlexW2156573030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.