Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873181›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2016

Hot executive function following moderate-to-late preterm birth: altered delay discounting at 4 years of age.

Amanda S Hodel, Jane E Brumbaugh, Alyssa R Morris, Kathleen M Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hot Executive Function Assessment Instruments in Preschool Children: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Cognitive and Learning Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants at School Age: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Individual differences in ERP measures of executive function in early childhood: Relation to low-risk preterm birth and parent-reported behavior.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda S HodelInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.
Jane E BrumbaughStead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.
Alyssa R MorrisInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.
Kathleen M ThomasInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training Program in Cognitive ScienceT32HD007151 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI KERSTEN, DANIEL J · 1985 to 2013
$4.4M
Translational Research in Neurobiolgy of Disease Training ProgramT32DA022616 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LOW, WALTER C · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS #5HT-32HD007151NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007151NIDA NIH HHS #T32-DA022616NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA022616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in monitoring long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of children born moderate-to-late preterm (32-36 weeks gestation) is increasing. Moderate-to-late preterm birth has a negative impact on academic achievement, which may relate to differential development of executive function (EF). Prior studies reporting deficits in EF in preterm children have almost exclusively assessed EF in affectively neutral contexts in high-risk preterm children (< 32 weeks gestation). Disrupted function in motivational or emotionally charged contexts (hot EF) following preterm birth remains uninvestigated, despite evidence that preterm children show differential development of neural circuitry subserving hot EF, including reduced orbitofrontal cortex volume. The present study is the first to examine whether low-risk, healthy children born moderate-to-late preterm exhibit impairments in the development of hot EF. Preterm children at age 4.5 years were less likely to choose larger, delayed rewards across all levels of reward magnitude on a delay discounting task using tangible rewards, but performed more similarly to their full-term peers on a delay aversion task involving abstract rewards and on measures of cool EF. The relationship between gestational age at birth and selection of delayed rewards extended across the entire gestational age range of the sample (32-42 weeks), and remained significant after controlling for intelligence and processing speed. Results imply that there is not a finite cut-off point at which children are spared from potential long-term neurodevelopmental effects of PT birth. Further investigation of reward processing and hot EF in individuals with a history of PT birth is warranted given the susceptibility of prefrontal cortex development to early environmental variations.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDelay DiscountingExecutive FunctionPremature BirthChild, PreschoolEmotionsFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMotivation

Identifiers

PMID25873181
PMCPMC8170854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.