Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25873067›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The POSE study - panic control treatment versus panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy under randomized and self-selection conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Rolf Sandell, Martin Svensson, Thomas Nilsson, Håkan Johansson, Gardar Viborg, Sean Perrin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01606592 (Phase 2/3 Study of Panic Control Treatment vs Panic-Focussed Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Under Randomized and Self-Selection Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01606592 nacompletednot on this map

Phase 2/3 Study of Panic Control Treatment vs Panic-Focussed Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Under Randomized and Self-Selection Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2010 to 2021Enrolled216ConditionsPanic Disorder (With or Without Agoraphobia)ArmsPanic Control Treatment (PCT), Panic-Focused Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PFPP), Waiting-list
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rolf SandellDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, Lund, 221 00, Sweden. rolf.sandell@psy.lu.se.
Martin SvenssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, Lund, 221 00, Sweden. Martin.A.Svensson@regionhalland.se.
Thomas NilssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, Lund, 221 00, Sweden. Thomas.K.Nilsson@skane.se.
Håkan JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, Lund, 221 00, Sweden. hakan.johansson@psy.lu.se.
Gardar ViborgDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, Lund, 221 00, Sweden. gardar.viborg@psy.lu.se.
Sean PerrinDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Box 213, Lund, 221 00, Sweden. sean.perrin@psy.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPanic disorder with or without agoraphobia is a commonly occurring disorder affecting 2 to 3% of the population in Sweden. Untreated, panic disorder is a chronic condition that significantly increases the risk for psychiatric comorbidity, morbidity and mortality, employment difficulties, and healthcare utilization. Cognitive behavioral approaches are the recommended first-line treatment for panic disorder; however, many patients in routine care receive another evidence-based psychotherapy, including psychodynamic therapy. Allowing patients to choose among evidence-based approaches to panic disorder may improve outcomes and reduce overall health costs. Trials comparing the 'gold standard' treatment for panic disorder to other evidence-based psychotherapies are needed, and also trials that can separate patient preferences for treatment from randomization effects on outcome, disability and healthcare utilization in the longer term. METHODS/

designA phase 2/3 doubly-randomized controlled trial carried out in routine care with 216 adults (aged 18 to 70 years) with a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV Panic Disorder (with or without Agoraphobia). Within each clinic, patients are randomized to self-selection, random assignment of treatment, or wait-list. Patients choose or are randomly assigned to either Panic Control Treatment or Panic-Focused Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. Primary outcomes are changes in panic symptom severity, occupational status, and sickness-related absences from work at post-treatment and 6, 12 and 24 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in agoraphobic avoidance, psychiatric comorbidity, disability, and healthcare utilization. The study also employs elements of an effectiveness trial as therapist and service-related effects on outcome will be estimated. Putative change mechanisms for the two treatments are also assessed. DISCUSSION: Cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapies are both evidence-based approaches that are routinely offered to panic disordered patients in Sweden. However, little is known about the relative effectiveness of these two approaches for panic/agoraphobia, work-related disability and healthcare utilization over the longer term. The current trial (POSE) also addresses the important but understudied issue of whether patient preference for a particular psychotherapeutic approach moderates outcome.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01606592 (registered 19 March 2012).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPsychotherapy, PsychodynamicAdolescentAdultAgedAgoraphobiaClinical ProtocolsHumansMiddle AgedPanic DisorderPatient ParticipationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25873067
PMCPMC4393576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.