Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872970›Full record

ArticleJournal of emergency nursing2015

Emergency Department Placement and Management of Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Older Adults: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice.

Kartik Viswanathan, Tony Rosen, Mary R Mulcare, Sunday Clark, Jaime Hayes, Mark S Lachs, Neal E Flomenbaum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of emergency nursing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kartik ViswanathanNew York, NY.
Tony RosenNew York, NY. Electronic address: aer2006@med.cornell.edu.
Mary R MulcareNew York, NY.
Sunday ClarkNew York, NY.
Jaime HayesNew York, NY.
Mark S LachsNew York, NY.
Neal E FlomenbaumNew York, NY.
New York Proton Center · US

Funding

Mid Career Mentoring Award In Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AG022399 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LACHS, MARK STEVEN · 2003 to 2015
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG022399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIndwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) are placed frequently in older adults in the emergency department (ED). Though often a critical intervention, IUCs carry significant risks. Our objective was to examine current knowledge, attitudes, and practice of emergency nurses and other providers regarding IUC placement and management in older adults.

methodsWe surveyed ED providers at a large, urban, academic medical center. We developed questionnaires using items from previously validated instruments and questions created for this study. We also assessed providers' management of 25 unique clinical scenarios, each representing an established appropriate or inappropriate indication for IUC placement.

results129 ED providers participated: 43 nurses and 86 other providers. Ninety-one percent of nurses and 87% of other providers reported comfort with appropriate indications for IUC placement. Despite this, on the clinical vignettes, nurses correctly identified the appropriate approach for IUC placement in only 40% of cases and other providers in only 37%. Practice varied widely between individual providers, with the nurse participants reporting appropriate practice in 16%-64% of clinical scenarios and other providers in 8%-68%. Few nurses or other providers reported reassessing their patients for IUC removal at transfer to the hospital (28% of nurses and 7% of other providers), admission (24% and 14%), or shift change (14% and 8%). DISCUSSION: Although emergency nurses and other providers report comfort with appropriate indications for IUC placement, reported practice patterns showed inconsistencies with established guidelines. Wide practice variation exists between individual providers. Moreover, nurses and other providers infrequently consider IUC removal after placement.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedCatheters, IndwellingClinical CompetenceEmergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleNursing Staff, HospitalSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary CatheterizationUrinary CathetersCatheter-related UTIEmergency nursingGeriatricsPatient safetyQuality improvementUrinary catheters

Identifiers

PMID25872970
PMCPMC4633299
OpenAlexW1965263683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.