Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872925›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Investigating the non-specific effects of BCG vaccination on the innate immune system in Ugandan neonates: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sarah Prentice, Emily L Webb, Hazel M Dockrell, Pontiano Kaleebu, Alison M Elliott, Stephen Cose

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Immune activation and paediatric HIV-1 disease outcome.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah PrenticeWellcome Trust - Bloomsbury Centre for Global Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Sarah.prentice@lshtm.ac.uk.
Emily L WebbDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Emily.webb@lshtm.ac.uk.
Hazel M DockrellWellcome Trust - Bloomsbury Centre for Global Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Hazel.dockrell@lshtm.ac.uk.
Pontiano KaleebuMRC/Uganda Virus Research Institute on AIDS, Plot 51-59, Nakiwogo Road, PO Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda. pontiano.kaleebu@mrcuganda.org.
Alison M ElliottWellcome Trust - Bloomsbury Centre for Global Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. alison.elliott@mrcuganda.org.
Stephen CoseDepartment of Infection and Immunology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Stephen.cose@lshtm.ac.uk.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUganda Virus Research Institute · UGUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 100714Wellcome Trust ITCRZB84
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe potential for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination to protect infants against non-mycobacterial disease has been suggested by a randomised controlled trial conducted in low birth-weight infants in West Africa. Trials to confirm these findings in healthy term infants, and in a non-West African setting, have not yet been carried out. In addition, a biological mechanism to explain such heterologous effects of BCG in the neonatal period has not been confirmed. This trial aims to address these issues by evaluating whether BCG non-specifically enhances the innate immune system in term Ugandan neonates, leading to increased protection from a variety of infectious diseases.

methodsThis trial will be an investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial of 560 Ugandan neonates, comparing those receiving BCG at birth with those receiving BCG at 6 weeks of age. This design allows comparison of outcomes between BCG-vaccinated and -naïve infants until 6 weeks of age, and between early and delayed BCG-vaccinated infants from 6 weeks of age onwards. The primary outcomes of the study will be a panel of innate immune parameters. Secondary outcomes will include clinical illness measures. DISCUSSION: Investigation of the possible broadly protective effects of neonatal BCG immunisation, and the optimal vaccination timing to produce these effects, could have profound implications for public healthcare policy. Evidence of protection against heterologous pathogens would underscore the importance of prioritising BCG administration in a timely manner for all infants, provide advocacy against the termination of BCG's use and support novel anti-tuberculous vaccine strategies that would safeguard such beneficial effects.

trial registrationISRCTN59683017 : registration date: 15 January 2014.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleVaccinationAge FactorsBCG VaccineClinical ProtocolsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunity, InnateInfantInfant, NewbornResearch DesignTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUgandaBCG Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID25872925
PMCPMC4413988
OpenAlexW2141475834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.