ArticleElectrophoresis2015
Real-time dielectrophoretic signaling and image quantification methods for evaluating electrokinetic properties of nanoparticles.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review on AC-Dielectrophoresis of Nanoparticles.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Characterization of Simple and Double Yeast Cells Using Dielectrophoretic Force Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Measuring Nanoparticle Polarizability Using Fluorescence Microscopy.Nano letters · 2019Article
- Quantitative Investigation for the Dielectrophoretic Effect of Fluorescent Dyes at Single-Cell Resolution.ACS omega · 2018Article
- Dielectrophoresis for Biomedical Sciences Applications: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time image signaling and quantification methods are described that allow easy-to-use, fast extraction of the electrical properties of nanoparticles. Positive dielectrophoretic (pDEP) collection rate analysis enables the dielectric properties of very small samples of nanoparticles to be accurately quantified. Advancing earlier work involving dual-cycle pulsed pDEP collection experiments, we report the development of a statistical image quantification method that significantly advances the evaluation of nanoparticle dielectric properties. Compared with traditional methods that require information about the geometry of the electrode array to be entered for semiautomated quantification , the new statistical approach described does not require a priori knowledge of device geometry. The efficacy of the statistical method is experimentally demonstrated using 200 nm diameter latex nanospheres, suspended in low conductivity medium, that are attracted by pDEP onto planar castellated electrode arrays with 5-micron-sized features. The method is shown to yield estimates for the nanoparticle conductivity and surface conductance, σp=25.8 mS/m and KS=1.29 nS, that concur closely with those obtained using traditional geometric methods previously reported . Consequently, the statistical method is accurate, fast, robust, supervisor-free, and useful for determining nanoparticle electrokinetic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.