Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872874›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2015

Real-time dielectrophoretic signaling and image quantification methods for evaluating electrokinetic properties of nanoparticles.

David J Bakewell, Joe Bailey, David Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David J BakewellDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Electronics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Joe BaileyLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.
David HolmesLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time image signaling and quantification methods are described that allow easy-to-use, fast extraction of the electrical properties of nanoparticles. Positive dielectrophoretic (pDEP) collection rate analysis enables the dielectric properties of very small samples of nanoparticles to be accurately quantified. Advancing earlier work involving dual-cycle pulsed pDEP collection experiments, we report the development of a statistical image quantification method that significantly advances the evaluation of nanoparticle dielectric properties. Compared with traditional methods that require information about the geometry of the electrode array to be entered for semiautomated quantification , the new statistical approach described does not require a priori knowledge of device geometry. The efficacy of the statistical method is experimentally demonstrated using 200 nm diameter latex nanospheres, suspended in low conductivity medium, that are attracted by pDEP onto planar castellated electrode arrays with 5-micron-sized features. The method is shown to yield estimates for the nanoparticle conductivity and surface conductance, σp=25.8 mS/m and KS=1.29 nS, that concur closely with those obtained using traditional geometric methods previously reported . Consequently, the statistical method is accurate, fast, robust, supervisor-free, and useful for determining nanoparticle electrokinetic parameters.

Indexed as

ElectrodesElectrophoresisEquipment DesignImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNanoparticlesAC electrokineticsCollection rateDielectrophoresisNanoparticleReal-time measurement

Identifiers

PMID25872874
PMCPMC5034756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.