Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872619›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Attention placebo control in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions: theory and practice.

Lukka Popp, Silvia Schneider

Registry-linked trialAbstract readLetterRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02313493 (Improving Mental Health in First Time Parents - A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02313493 naunknown statusnot on this map

Improving Mental Health in First Time Parents - A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuhr University of BochumRan2012 to 2015Enrolled78ConditionsMental Disorders During PregnancyArmsBaby Triple P
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lukka PoppDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany. lukka.popp@rub.de.
Silvia SchneiderDepartment of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany. silvia.schneider@rub.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAttention placebo control (APC) is considered a highly valid control condition when conducting trials of social interventions. Unfortunately, an appropriate APC condition is rarely used. This letter discusses the tension between methodological and ethical requirements of an APC group in psychosocial interventions based on our experiences with a randomized controlled efficacy study of a parent training program. To prevent negative side effects and high drop-out rates, feasible and accepted attention control conditions are discussed. The paradigms of placebo research must be adapted to the special challenges of psychosocial intervention research.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02313493 : registered 10 December 2014.

Indexed as

Education, NonprofessionalParentingPlacebosResearch DesignGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient DropoutsPatient SelectionPeer GroupResearch SubjectsSample SizeSelf-Help GroupsPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID25872619
PMCPMC4404062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.