Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872529›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Anne Christin Rahn, Sascha Köpke, Jürgen Kasper, Eik Vettorazzi, Ingrid Mühlhauser, Christoph Heesen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04236544 (Impact of a Multimedia Website With Patient Experiences of Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04236544 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Multimedia Website With Patient Experiences of Multiple Sclerosis (PExMS) on Immunotherapy Decision-making: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial in a Mixed-methods Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2024 to 2025Enrolled55ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Patient Engagement, Self EfficacyArmsPExMS and DECIMS-Wiki, DECIMS-Wiki
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients-A web-based randomized controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Christin RahnInstitute for Neuroimmunology and Clinical MS Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany. Anne.Rahn@uni-hamburg.de.
Sascha KöpkeNursing Research Unit, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538, Lübeck, Germany. sascha.koepke@uksh.de.
Jürgen KasperFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Care Sciences, University of Tromsø, MH Building, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway. juergen.kasper@uit.no.
Eik VettorazziDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany. E.Vettorazzi@uke.de.
Ingrid MühlhauserUnit of Health Sciences and Education, MIN Faculty, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, D-20146, Hamburg, Germany. Ingrid_Muehlhauser@uni-hamburg.de.
Christoph HeesenInstitute for Neuroimmunology and Clinical MS Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany. heesen@uke.de.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decision-making has become more complex for patients. Structured decision coaching, based on the principles of evidence-based patient information and shared decision-making, has the potential to facilitate participation of individuals in the decision-making process. This cluster randomised controlled trial follows the assumption that decision coaching by trained nurses, using evidence-based patient information and preference elicitation, will facilitate informed choices and induce higher decision quality, as well as better decisional adherence. METHODS/

designThe decision coaching programme will be evaluated through an evaluator-blinded superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, including 300 patients with suspected or definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, facing an immunotherapy decision. The clusters are 12 multiple sclerosis outpatient clinics in Germany. Further, the trial will be accompanied by a mixed-methods process evaluation and a cost-effectiveness study. Nurses in the intervention group will be trained in shared decision-making, coaching, and evidence-based patient information principles. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive decision coaching (intervention group) with up to three face-to-face coaching sessions with a trained nurse (decision coach) or counselling as usual (control group). Patients in both groups will be given access to an evidence-based online information tool. The primary outcome is 'informed choice' after six months, assessed with the multi-dimensional measure of informed choice including the sub-dimensions risk knowledge (questionnaire), attitude concerning immunotherapy (questionnaire), and immunotherapy uptake (telephone survey). Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict, adherence to immunotherapy decisions, autonomy preference, planned behaviour, coping self-efficacy, and perceived involvement in coaching and decisional encounters. Safety outcomes are comprised of anxiety and depression and disease-specific quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness of a new model of patient decision support concerning MS-immunotherapy options. The delegation of treatment information provision from physicians to trained nurses bears the potential to change current doctor-focused practice in Germany.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN37929939 ), May 27, 2014.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsImmunotherapyHumansMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNursesPatient SelectionSample Size

Identifiers

PMID25872529
PMCPMC4397890
OpenAlexW2129157277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.