Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872504›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

WARRIOR-trial - is routine radiography following the 2-week initial follow-up in trauma patients with wrist and ankle fractures necessary: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Nikki L Weil, M Frank Termaat, Sidney M Rubinstein, Mostafa El Moumni, Wietse P Zuidema, Robert Jan Derksen, Pieta Krijnen, Leti van Bodegom-Vos, Klaus W Wendt, Cornelis van Kuijk and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Perception of quality of intraoperative fluoroscopy and the influence on postoperative management: an international survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikki L WeilDepartment of Surgery/Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. n.l.weil@lumc.nl.
M Frank TermaatDepartment of Surgery/Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. m.f.termaat@lumc.nl.
Sidney M RubinsteinDepartment of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. s.m.rubinstein@vu.nl.
Mostafa El MoumniDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. m.el.moumni@umcg.nl.
Wietse P ZuidemaDepartment of Surgery/Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. w.zuidema@vumc.nl.
Robert Jan DerksenDepartment of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, P.O. Box 1074, 1940 EB, Beverwijk, the Netherlands. rderksen@rkz.nl.
Pieta KrijnenDepartment of Surgery/Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. p.krijnen@lumc.nl.
Leti van Bodegom-VosDepartment of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. L.van_Bodegom-Vos@lumc.nl.
Klaus W WendtDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. k.w.wendt@umcg.nl.
Cornelis van KuijkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. c.vankuijk@vumc.nl.
Frits R RosendaalDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. F.R.Rosendaal@lumc.nl.
Roelf S BreederveldDepartment of Surgery/Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. r.s.breederveld@lumc.nl.
J Carel GoslingsTrauma Unit, Academic Medical Centre, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. j.c.goslings@amc.nl.
Inger B SchipperDepartment of Surgery/Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands. i.b.schipper@lumc.nl.
Maurits W van TulderDepartment of Health Sciences and the EMGO-Institute, VU University, de Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. maurits.van.tulder@vu.nl.
Leiden University · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLRed Cross Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtremity fractures such as wrist and ankle fractures are a common and costly healthcare problem. The management of these fractures depends on fracture type and loss of congruity of the joint, resulting in cast immobilization or operative treatment. Loss of congruity or displacement leading to uneven joint loading, osteoarthritis and an increased probability of a poor functional outcome should be identified within the first 2 weeks post-trauma, based upon radiographs to determine optimal treatment. After this period, routine radiographs are scheduled for monitoring the bone-healing process. Current protocols describe imaging at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma. However, it is questionable whether routine radiography following the initial follow-up ( 2-weeks post-trauma) is cost effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether a modification of the radiographic follow-up protocol can be conducted with no worse outcome and less cost than the current standard of care for patients with a wrist or ankle fracture. METHODS/

designIn a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 697 patients aged 18 years or older will be included: 385 wrist fracture- and 312 ankle fracture patients. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 receives usual care, consisting of radiographs 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma; Group 2 receives radiographs beyond the initial follow-up only when clinically indicated. The primary outcome is the overall extremity-specific function. For wrist fractures, this includes the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score; for the ankle fractures, this includes the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes include: healthcare cost, the specific function measured with the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation for wrist fractures and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons foot and ankle questionnaire for ankle fractures, pain-intensity, health-related quality of life, self-perceived recovery, and complications. Both groups will be monitored at 1, 2, and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months. DISCUSSION: This study will provide data on (cost) effectiveness of routine radiography in the follow-up of wrist and ankle fractures, and could pave the way for a change in (inter)national protocols.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR4610 , registration date 22 June 2014.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesArthrographyClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisability EvaluationFracture HealingHealth Care CostsHumansNetherlandsPain MeasurementPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25872504
PMCPMC4362635
OpenAlexW2144707022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.