Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25872503›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

SMS-based smoking cessation intervention among university students: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (NEXit trial).

Ulrika Müssener, Marcus Bendtsen, Nadine Karlsson, Ian R White, Jim McCambridge, Preben Bendtsen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulrika MüssenerDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. ulrika.mussener@liu.se.
Marcus BendtsenDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. marcus.bendtsen@liu.se.
Nadine KarlssonDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. nadine.karlsson@liu.se.
Ian R WhiteMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. ian.white@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk.
Jim McCambridgeDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. Jim.mccambridge@york.ac.uk.
Preben BendtsenDepartment of Medical Specialist and Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Motala, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. Preben.bendtsen@liu.se.
Linköping University · SEMRC Biostatistics Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105260558Medical Research Council U105260558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost smoking efforts targeting young people have so far been focused on prevention of initiation, whereas smoking cessation interventions have largely been targeted towards adult populations. Thus, there is limited evidence for effective smoking cessation interventions in young people, even though many young people want to quit smoking. Mobile communication technology has the potential to reach large numbers of young people and recent text-based smoking cessation interventions using phones have shown promising results. METHODS/

designThe study aims to evaluate a newly developed text-based smoking cessation intervention for students in colleges and universities in Sweden. The design is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a delayed/waiting list intervention control condition. The trial will be performed simultaneously in all colleges and universities served by 25 student health care centres in Sweden. Outcomes will be evaluated after 4 months, with 2 cessation primary outcomes and 4 secondary outcomes. After outcome evaluation the control group will be given access to the intervention. DISCUSSION: The study will examine the effectiveness of a stand-alone SMS text-based intervention. The intervention starts with a motivational phase in which the participants are given an opportunity to set a quit date within 4 weeks of randomisation. This first phase and the subsequent core intervention phase of 12 weeks are totally automated in order to easily integrate the intervention into the daily routines of student and other health care settings. As well as providing data for the effectiveness of the intervention, the study will also provide data for methodological analyses addressing a number issues commonly challenging in Internet-based RCTs. For example, an extensive follow-up strategy will be used in order to evaluate the use of repeated attempts in the analysis, and in particular to explore the validity of a possible missing not at random assumption that the odds ratio between the primary outcome and response is the same at every attempt.

trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN75766527, dated assigned 4 November 2014. Protocol version: Version 1, and date 7 November 2014.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsText MessagingAdultHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareSmoking CessationStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID25872503
PMCPMC4403894
OpenAlexW2065342550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.