Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25871933›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Dominance of sulfur-fueled iron oxide reduction in low-sulfate freshwater sediments.

Colleen M Hansel, Chris J Lentini, Yuanzhi Tang, David T Johnston, Scott D Wankel, Philip M Jardine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial ecology of shallow groundwater ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In situ arsenic immobilisation for coastal aquifers using stimulated iron cycling: Lab-based viability assessment.Applied geochemistry : journal of the International Association of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lithogenic hydrogen supports microbial primary production in subglacial and proglacial environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Colleen M HanselDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Chris J LentiniSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yuanzhi TangSchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
David T JohnstonDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Scott D WankelDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Philip M Jardine
Harvard University · USWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central tenant in microbial biogeochemistry is that microbial metabolisms follow a predictable sequence of terminal electron acceptors based on the energetic yield for the reaction. It is thereby oftentimes assumed that microbial respiration of ferric iron outcompetes sulfate in all but high-sulfate systems, and thus sulfide has little influence on freshwater or terrestrial iron cycling. Observations of sulfate reduction in low-sulfate environments have been attributed to the presumed presence of highly crystalline iron oxides allowing sulfate reduction to be more energetically favored. Here we identified the iron-reducing processes under low-sulfate conditions within columns containing freshwater sediments amended with structurally diverse iron oxides and fermentation products that fuel anaerobic respiration. We show that despite low sulfate concentrations and regardless of iron oxide substrate (ferrihydrite, Al-ferrihydrite, goethite, hematite), sulfidization was a dominant pathway in iron reduction. This process was mediated by (re)cycling of sulfur upon reaction of sulfide and iron oxides to support continued sulfur-based respiration--a cryptic sulfur cycle involving generation and consumption of sulfur intermediates. Although canonical iron respiration was not observed in the sediments amended with the more crystalline iron oxides, iron respiration did become dominant in the presence of ferrihydrite once sulfate was consumed. Thus, despite more favorable energetics, ferrihydrite reduction did not precede sulfate reduction and instead an inverse redox zonation was observed. These findings indicate that sulfur (re)cycling is a dominant force in iron cycling even in low-sulfate systems and in a manner difficult to predict using the classical thermodynamic ladder.

Indexed as

DesulfovibrioFerric CompoundsFresh WaterGasesGeologic SedimentsIronIron CompoundsMineralsOxidation-ReductionOxidesOxygen ConsumptionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfatesSulfidesSulfurSulfur CompoundsFerric Compoundsferric oxideferric oxyhydroxideGasesgoethiteIronIron CompoundsMineralsOxidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfatesSulfidesSulfurSulfur Compoundssulfur monoxide

Identifiers

PMID25871933
PMCPMC4611504
OpenAlexW1990536164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.