ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2015
Gene-Gene Interactions Detection Using a Two-stage Model.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review on GPU accelerated methods for genome-wide SNP-SNP interactions.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Review
- Enhanced methods to detect haplotypic effects on gene expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Local Joint Testing Improves Power and Identifies Hidden Heritability in Association Studies.Genetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered numerous loci involved in genetic traits. Virtually all studies have reported associations between individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and traits. However, it is likely that complex traits are influenced by interaction of multiple SNPs. One approach to detect interactions of SNPs is the brute force approach which performs a pairwise association test between a trait and each pair of SNPs. The brute force approach is often computationally infeasible because of the large number of SNPs collected in current GWAS studies. We propose a two-stage model, Threshold-based Efficient Pairwise Association Approach (TEPAA), to reduce the number of tests needed while maintaining almost identical power to the brute force approach. In the first stage, our method performs the single marker test on all SNPs and selects a subset of SNPs that achieve a certain significance threshold. In the second stage, we perform a pairwise association test between traits and pairs of the SNPs selected from the first stage. The key insight of our approach is that we derive the joint distribution between the association statistics of a single SNP and the association statistics of pairs of SNPs. This joint distribution allows us to provide guarantees that the statistical power of our approach will closely approximate the brute force approach. We applied our approach to the Northern Finland Birth Cohort data and achieved 63 times speedup while maintaining 99% of the power of the brute force approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.