ArticleJAMA2015
Screening for osteoporosis.
Article in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The risk factors determined by four machine learning methods for the change of difference of bone mineral density in post-menopausal women after three years follow-up.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dietary intervention reprograms bone marrow cellular signaling in obese mice.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Protocol for the models of primary osteoporosis screening in men (MOPS) cluster randomized trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Deep learning for biomarker regression: application to osteoporosis and emphysema on chest CT scans.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2018Article
- Chronic joint pain and handgrip strength correlates with osteoporosis in mid-life women: a Singaporean cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017Article
- Inter-observer and inter-examination variability of manual vertebral bone attenuation measurements on computed tomography.European radiology · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25871674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.