Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25871548›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2015

Single-Molecule Analyte Recognition with ClyA Nanopores Equipped with Internal Protein Adaptors.

Misha Soskine, Annemie Biesemans, Giovanni Maglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Real-time label-free detection of dynamic aptamer-small molecule interactions using a nanopore nucleic acid conformational sensor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Misha Soskine *Groningen Biomolecular Sciences & Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annemie Biesemans *Department of Chemistry, University of Leuven, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Giovanni MagliaGroningen Biomolecular Sciences & Biotechnology (GBB) Institute, University of Groningen, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 260884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopores have been used to detect molecules, to sequence DNA, or to investigate chemical reactions at the single-molecule level. Because they approach the absolute limit of sensor miniaturization, nanopores are amenable to parallelization and could be used in single-cell measurements. Here we show that single enzymes can be functionally and reversibly trapped inside the confined space of a ClyA nanopore. Remarkably, the binding of ligands to the internalized proteins is mirrored by specific changes to the nanopore conductance. Conveniently, the manipulation of the charge of the protein allowed increasing of the residence time of the protein inside the nanopore. Nanopores with internalized protein adaptors can be used to study proteins in real time or can be incorporated into inexpensive portable devices for the detection of analytes with high selectivity.

Indexed as

NanoporesCytotoxinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsLigandsMixed Function OxygenasesModels, MolecularTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseAlkB protein, E coliCytotoxinsEscherichia coli ProteinsLigandsMixed Function OxygenasesTetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID25871548
PMCPMC4424005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.