Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25870918›Full record

ReviewGynecologic oncology2015

Impact of obesity on chemotherapy management and outcomes in women with gynecologic malignancies.

Neil S Horowitz, Alexi A Wright

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Metabolic risk factors of ovarian cancer: a review.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Excess Body Fatness during Early to Mid-Adulthood and Survival from Colorectal and Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Five International Cohort Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Obesity and gynecological cancers: A toxic relationship.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Obesity in Gynecologic Oncology.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil S HorowitzDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, USA. Electronic address: nhorowitz@partners.org.
Alexi A WrightDivision of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Chemotherapy Near Death: Modifiable Factors and Outcomes in Ovarian CancerK07CA166210 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI WRIGHT, ALEXI A · 2013 to 2017
$886k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA166210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and dosing of chemotherapies and provide recommendations for chemotherapy management in obese women with gynecologic malignancies.

methodsPubMEd and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles published before June 2014. Only English-language articles were considered. 84 manuscripts were reviewed and 66 were included. Search terms included: obesity, overweight, body mass index, body surface area, glomerular filtration rate, chemotherapy, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, inflammation, and pharmacokinetics,

resultsObese cancer patients have worse clinical outcomes, compared with non-obese patients. This may be because of differences in pharmacokinetics, metabolic dysregulation, or physicians' decisions to reduce chemotherapy dose-intensity during treatment to minimize toxicities. A 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline recommends using actual body weight for chemotherapy dosing in all patients treated with curative intent, irrespective of obesity, to avoid compromising clinical outcomes, including progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In women with gynecologic cancers most studies demonstrate no difference in PFS or OS when obese patients receive the same chemotherapy dose intensity as non-obese patients, except perhaps with bevacizumab.

conclusionsChemotherapy dose-intensity is a critical determinant of cancer outcomes and should be maintained in all patients, irrespective of obesity. Future studies should prospectively examine the impact of obesity on clinical outcomes (adverse events, survival) to improve the care of this growing population of patients who are at risk for inferior clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansObesityAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapyDosingEndometrial cancerObesityOvarian cancerPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID25870918
PMCPMC4469517
OpenAlexW1998201860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.