Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25870852›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2015

BikeMaps.org: A Global Tool for Collision and Near Miss Mapping.

Trisalyn A Nelson, Taylor Denouden, Benjamin Jestico, Karen Laberee, Meghan Winters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why Not Pedal for the Planet? The Role of Perceived Norms for Driver Aggression as a Deterrent to Cycling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. WalkRollMap.org: Crowdsourcing barriers to mobility.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Accelerating ethics, empathy, and equity in geographic information science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Trisalyn A NelsonSpatial Pattern Analysis and Research (SPAR) Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Victoria , Victoria, BC , Canada.
Taylor DenoudenSpatial Pattern Analysis and Research (SPAR) Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Victoria , Victoria, BC , Canada.
Benjamin JesticoSpatial Pattern Analysis and Research (SPAR) Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Victoria , Victoria, BC , Canada.
Karen LabereeSpatial Pattern Analysis and Research (SPAR) Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Victoria , Victoria, BC , Canada.
Meghan WintersFaculty of Health Sciences, Center for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Simon Fraser University , Vancouver, BC , Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many public health benefits to cycling, such as chronic disease reduction and improved air quality. Real and perceived concerns about safety are primary barriers to new ridership. Due to limited forums for official reporting of cycling incidents, lack of comprehensive data is limiting our ability to study cycling safety and conduct surveillance. Our goal is to introduce BikeMaps.org, a new website developed by the authors for crowd-source mapping of cycling collisions and near misses. BikeMaps.org is a global mapping system that allows citizens to map locations of cycling incidents and report on the nature of the event. Attributes collected are designed for spatial modeling research on predictors of safety and risk, and to aid surveillance and planning. Released in October 2014, within 2 months the website had more than 14,000 visitors and mapping in 14 countries. Collisions represent 38% of reports (134/356) and near misses 62% (222/356). In our pilot city, Victoria, Canada, citizens mapped data equivalent to about 1 year of official cycling collision reports within 2 months via BikeMaps.org. Using report completeness as an indicator, early reports indicate that data are of high quality with 50% being fully attributed and another 10% having only one missing attribute. We are advancing this technology, with the development of a mobile App, improved data visualization, real-time altering of hazard reports, and automated open-source tools for data sharing. Researchers and citizens interested in utilizing the BikeMaps.org technology can get involved by encouraging citizen mapping in their region.

Indexed as

active transportationbicycling safetycitizen sciencecycling safety surveillancenear miss

Identifiers

PMID25870852
PMCPMC4378118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.