ArticleFrontiers in public health2015
BikeMaps.org: A Global Tool for Collision and Near Miss Mapping.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregivers' perspectives on the in-home implementation and effectiveness of "Miffy eats the rainbow!": a colorful, modeling- and reward-based intervention to improve fruit and vegetable intake in children.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Computer vision and statistical insights into cycling near miss dynamics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Contributing factors to near-miss experiences of motorcyclists in Thailand: A random parameter probit model approach.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Why Not Pedal for the Planet? The Role of Perceived Norms for Driver Aggression as a Deterrent to Cycling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- WalkRollMap.org: Crowdsourcing barriers to mobility.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- Accelerating ethics, empathy, and equity in geographic information science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Comparing bicyclists who use smartphone apps to record rides with those who do not: implications for representativeness and selection bias.Journal of transport & health · 2019Article
- Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities.BMJ open · 2018Observational
- Integrating Kindergartener-Specific Questionnaires With Citizen Science to Improve Child Health.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
- Assessing the Exposome with External Measures: Commentary on the State of the Science and Research Recommendations.Annual review of public health · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are many public health benefits to cycling, such as chronic disease reduction and improved air quality. Real and perceived concerns about safety are primary barriers to new ridership. Due to limited forums for official reporting of cycling incidents, lack of comprehensive data is limiting our ability to study cycling safety and conduct surveillance. Our goal is to introduce BikeMaps.org, a new website developed by the authors for crowd-source mapping of cycling collisions and near misses. BikeMaps.org is a global mapping system that allows citizens to map locations of cycling incidents and report on the nature of the event. Attributes collected are designed for spatial modeling research on predictors of safety and risk, and to aid surveillance and planning. Released in October 2014, within 2 months the website had more than 14,000 visitors and mapping in 14 countries. Collisions represent 38% of reports (134/356) and near misses 62% (222/356). In our pilot city, Victoria, Canada, citizens mapped data equivalent to about 1 year of official cycling collision reports within 2 months via BikeMaps.org. Using report completeness as an indicator, early reports indicate that data are of high quality with 50% being fully attributed and another 10% having only one missing attribute. We are advancing this technology, with the development of a mobile App, improved data visualization, real-time altering of hazard reports, and automated open-source tools for data sharing. Researchers and citizens interested in utilizing the BikeMaps.org technology can get involved by encouraging citizen mapping in their region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.