Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25870763›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2015

Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions.

Benjamin Gardner, Sharon Corbridge, Laura McGowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Use IT again? Dynamic roles of habit, intention and their interaction on continued system use by individuals in utilitarian, volitional contexts.European journal of information systems : an official journal of the Operational Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How we are misinterpreting physical activity intention - behavior relations and what to do about it.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin GardnerHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK ; Current affiliation: Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 9th Floor, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD UK.
Sharon CorbridgeHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Laura McGowanHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK ; Current affiliation: Institute for Global Food Security, Northern Ireland Technology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 18-30 Malone Road, Room 02.024, Belfast, BT9 5BN UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHabit is defined as a process whereby an impulse towards behaviour is automatically initiated upon encountering a setting in which the behaviour has been performed in the past. A central tenet of habit theory is that habit overrides intentional tendencies in directing behaviour, such that as habit strength increases, intention becomes less predictive of behaviour. Yet, evidence of this effect has been methodologically limited by modelling the impact of positively-correlated habits and intentions. This study sought to test the effect of habits for unhealthy snacking on the relationship between intentions to avoid unhealthy snacks and snack intake.

methodsMethods were chosen to match those used in studies that have shown habit-intention interactions. 239 adults completed valid and reliable measures of habitual snacking and intention to avoid snacking at baseline, and a self-report measure of snack intake two weeks later. Data were analysed using multiple regression.

resultsWhile both habit and intention independently predicted snack intake, no interaction between habit and intention was found.

conclusionsNo support was found for the expected moderating impact of habit on the intention-behaviour relationship, indicating that individuals with intentions can act on those intentions despite having habits. Previous evidence of a habit-intention interaction effect may be unreliable. A growing literature indicates that habitual tendencies can be inhibited, albeit with difficulty. Habits and intentions may vary in the influence they exert over discrete behaviour instances. While the aggregation of behaviours across instances and individuals used in our study reflects the dominant methodology in habit research, it precludes examination of effects of in-situ habits and intentions. More sophisticated data collection and analysis methods may be needed to better understand potential habit-intention interactions.

Indexed as

AutomaticityDietHabitHealth behaviourReasoned actionSnacking

Identifiers

PMID25870763
PMCPMC4374191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.